Associations Between Risk Perceptions and Cigarette, E-cigarette, and Dual-Product Use Among Canadian Adolescents.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2020-03-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X20903784
Lauren C Manzione, Lingpeng Shan, Sunday Azagba
{"title":"Associations Between Risk Perceptions and Cigarette, E-cigarette, and Dual-Product Use Among Canadian Adolescents.","authors":"Lauren C Manzione,&nbsp;Lingpeng Shan,&nbsp;Sunday Azagba","doi":"10.1177/1179173X20903784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The popularity of e-cigarettes has increased significantly in recent years. E-cigarettes are perceived as less harmful than cigarettes, and both dual-use of cigarette and e-cigarette use is common among adolescents. This study assessed cigarette and e-cigarette risk perception and associations with dual-product use among Canadian adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the 2016-2017 Canadian Student Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drugs Survey. Perceived risks of cigarette and e-cigarette use were classified into 4 categories: \"high-risk perception,\" \"high-e-cigarette-risk and low-cigarette-risk perception,\" \"low-e-cigarette-risk and high-cigarette-risk perception,\" and \"low-risk perception.\" Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated from multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the population, 92% perceived high risk from cigarettes, and 65% from e-cigarettes. Compared to students with low-risk perception, those with high-risk perception of both products had lower odds of dual-use (aOR: 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15, 0.28), cigarette-only use (aOR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.45), and e-cigarette-only use (aOR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.79) relative to nonusers. Adolescents with high-e-cigarette and low-cigarette-risk perception had higher odds of e-cigarette-only use, relative to nonusers. Those with high-risk perception were more likely to be e-cigarette-only users relative to cigarette-only users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results highlight that high perceived risk is associated with lower odds of use. However, those with a high-risk perception of both products had higher odds of e-cigarette use relative to cigarette-only users; as did those with high-e-cigarette and low-cigarette-risk perception, relative to nonusers. Future research should assess ways of communicating the risks of adolescent tobacco use.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179173X20903784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179173X20903784","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20903784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: The popularity of e-cigarettes has increased significantly in recent years. E-cigarettes are perceived as less harmful than cigarettes, and both dual-use of cigarette and e-cigarette use is common among adolescents. This study assessed cigarette and e-cigarette risk perception and associations with dual-product use among Canadian adolescents.

Methods: We used data from the 2016-2017 Canadian Student Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drugs Survey. Perceived risks of cigarette and e-cigarette use were classified into 4 categories: "high-risk perception," "high-e-cigarette-risk and low-cigarette-risk perception," "low-e-cigarette-risk and high-cigarette-risk perception," and "low-risk perception." Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated from multinomial logistic regression.

Results: Of the population, 92% perceived high risk from cigarettes, and 65% from e-cigarettes. Compared to students with low-risk perception, those with high-risk perception of both products had lower odds of dual-use (aOR: 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15, 0.28), cigarette-only use (aOR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.45), and e-cigarette-only use (aOR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.79) relative to nonusers. Adolescents with high-e-cigarette and low-cigarette-risk perception had higher odds of e-cigarette-only use, relative to nonusers. Those with high-risk perception were more likely to be e-cigarette-only users relative to cigarette-only users.

Conclusion: Results highlight that high perceived risk is associated with lower odds of use. However, those with a high-risk perception of both products had higher odds of e-cigarette use relative to cigarette-only users; as did those with high-e-cigarette and low-cigarette-risk perception, relative to nonusers. Future research should assess ways of communicating the risks of adolescent tobacco use.

加拿大青少年风险认知与香烟、电子烟和双重产品使用之间的关系
引言:近年来,电子烟的普及程度显著提高。人们认为电子烟的危害比香烟小,在青少年中,香烟和电子烟的双重使用很常见。本研究评估了加拿大青少年对香烟和电子烟的风险认知及其与双重产品使用的关联。方法:我们使用了2016-2017年加拿大学生烟草、酒精和药物调查的数据。香烟和电子烟使用的感知风险分为4类:“高风险感知”、“高电子烟风险和低电子烟风险感知”、“低电子烟风险和高电子烟风险感知”和“低风险感知”。校正优势比(aOR)由多项逻辑回归估计。结果:在人群中,92%的人认为香烟有高风险,65%的人认为电子烟有高风险。与低风险认知的学生相比,对两种产品都有高风险认知的学生两用的几率更低(aOR: 0.21;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.15, 0.28),仅吸烟(aOR: 0.33;95% CI: 0.25, 0.45)和只使用电子烟(aOR: 0.64;95% CI: 0.51, 0.79)。与不使用电子烟的人相比,拥有高电子烟风险和低卷烟风险认知的青少年只使用电子烟的几率更高。与只吸香烟的人相比,那些有高风险认知的人更有可能成为只吸电子烟的人。结论:结果表明,高感知风险与低使用几率相关。然而,与只吸香烟的人相比,对这两种产品都有高风险认知的人使用电子烟的几率更高;与不使用电子烟的人相比,那些高电子烟风险和低电子烟风险认知的人也是如此。未来的研究应评估青少年烟草使用风险的宣传方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信