A Life Worth Living: Evidence on the Relationship Between Prosocial Values and Happiness.

IF 2.5 2区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
American Review of Public Administration Pub Date : 2015-05-01 Epub Date: 2013-07-04 DOI:10.1177/0275074013493657
Donald P Moynihan, Thomas DeLeire, Kohei Enami
{"title":"A Life Worth Living: Evidence on the Relationship Between Prosocial Values and Happiness.","authors":"Donald P Moynihan,&nbsp;Thomas DeLeire,&nbsp;Kohei Enami","doi":"10.1177/0275074013493657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Employees with a desire to help others provide benefits to their organization, clients, and fellow workers, but what do they get in return? We argue that the prosocial desire to help others is a basic human goal that matters to an individual's happiness. We employ both longitudinal and cross-sectional data to demonstrate that work-related prosocial motivation is associated with higher subjective well-being, both in terms of current happiness and life satisfaction later in life. Cross-sectional data also suggest that perceived social impact (the belief that one's job is making a difference) is even more important for happiness than the prosocial desire to help. The results show that the relationship between prosocial motivation and happiness is not limited to government employees, suggesting that in this aspect of altruistic behavior, public and private employees are not so different.</p>","PeriodicalId":48009,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Public Administration","volume":"45 3","pages":"311-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0275074013493657","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013493657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Employees with a desire to help others provide benefits to their organization, clients, and fellow workers, but what do they get in return? We argue that the prosocial desire to help others is a basic human goal that matters to an individual's happiness. We employ both longitudinal and cross-sectional data to demonstrate that work-related prosocial motivation is associated with higher subjective well-being, both in terms of current happiness and life satisfaction later in life. Cross-sectional data also suggest that perceived social impact (the belief that one's job is making a difference) is even more important for happiness than the prosocial desire to help. The results show that the relationship between prosocial motivation and happiness is not limited to government employees, suggesting that in this aspect of altruistic behavior, public and private employees are not so different.

有价值的生活:亲社会价值观与幸福关系的证据。
愿意帮助他人的员工为公司、客户和同事带来好处,但他们能得到什么回报呢?我们认为,帮助他人的亲社会愿望是一个基本的人类目标,它关系到个人的幸福。我们采用纵向和横断面数据来证明,与工作相关的亲社会动机与更高的主观幸福感有关,无论是在当前的幸福感还是在以后的生活满意度方面。横断面数据还表明,对于幸福感来说,感知到的社会影响(相信自己的工作正在发挥作用)甚至比助人的亲社会愿望更重要。结果表明,亲社会动机与幸福感之间的关系并不局限于政府雇员,这表明在这方面的利他行为,公共和私营雇员并没有太大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The American Review of Public Adminstration (ARPA) aspires to be the premier academic journal in the field of public affairs and public administration. As a peer-reviewed journal with the combined goals of advancing the knowledge of public administration and improving its practice, ARPA features articles that address rapidly emerging issues in public administration and public affairs and is open to both traditional and nontraditional apporaches. ARPA has no methodological bias other than a preference for an analytical approach to the issue(s) being addressed. Of particular interest are theory-based empirical research, commentaries on pressing issues, reviews or syntheses of research, and conceptual/theoretical discussions on or over the boundaries of traditional public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信