Understanding consumer preferences for care of adolescents with pelvic inflammatory disease.

Maria Trent, Harold Lehmann, Arlene Butz, Carol Thompson, Qiang Qian, Kevin D Frick
{"title":"Understanding consumer preferences for care of adolescents with pelvic inflammatory disease.","authors":"Maria Trent,&nbsp;Harold Lehmann,&nbsp;Arlene Butz,&nbsp;Carol Thompson,&nbsp;Qiang Qian,&nbsp;Kevin D Frick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to estimate consumers' maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) for follow-up PID services by physicians and community health nurses (CHNs), differences by consumer type (adolescents versus parents), and the differences in health-provider predicted WTP consumer estimates and actual consumer WTP estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this IRB-approved study, a contingent valuation method was used to collect WTP data regarding co-payments to physicians or nurses for clinical service delivery from the consumers of adolescent PID services (parents and adolescents) and health providers using a national convenience sample. Consumers were recruited from an academic pediatric and adolescent medicine clinic and five health department school-based health clinics in a large urban community with high (sexually transmitted infection) STI prevalence. Participants completed a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adolescents were willing to pay $36 more (95 % Cl : $27.9-44.3) for community health nursing care and parents were willing to pay $48 more dollars (95 % Cl : $40.3-$57.4) than physician's predicted. There were no significant differences in adolescent and parents WTP for physician or nursing services Consumers (adolescents & parents) WTP for physician PID services were on average $18.50 higher than CHN PID services (p = 0.01). Using physician estimates for WTP as the reference group, adolescents were willing to pay $56 more (95 % Cl : $48.6-$63.4) for physician care and parents were willing to pay $66 more (95 % Cl : $59.0-$72.8) than physician's predicted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents and parents are willing to pay more for physician follow-up for PID, but they are open to CHN follow-up visits based on the mean WTP for CHN visits. Since WTP also reflects the value that individuals place on a service, our data demonstrate that providers consistently underestimate the value consumers place on clinical services for x adolescents with PID.</p>","PeriodicalId":92692,"journal":{"name":"Medecine therapeutique medecine de la reproduction, gynecologie, endocrinologie","volume":"15 4","pages":"358-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530924/pdf/nihms-993879.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine therapeutique medecine de la reproduction, gynecologie, endocrinologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate consumers' maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) for follow-up PID services by physicians and community health nurses (CHNs), differences by consumer type (adolescents versus parents), and the differences in health-provider predicted WTP consumer estimates and actual consumer WTP estimates.

Methods: In this IRB-approved study, a contingent valuation method was used to collect WTP data regarding co-payments to physicians or nurses for clinical service delivery from the consumers of adolescent PID services (parents and adolescents) and health providers using a national convenience sample. Consumers were recruited from an academic pediatric and adolescent medicine clinic and five health department school-based health clinics in a large urban community with high (sexually transmitted infection) STI prevalence. Participants completed a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using linear regression analyses.

Results: Adolescents were willing to pay $36 more (95 % Cl : $27.9-44.3) for community health nursing care and parents were willing to pay $48 more dollars (95 % Cl : $40.3-$57.4) than physician's predicted. There were no significant differences in adolescent and parents WTP for physician or nursing services Consumers (adolescents & parents) WTP for physician PID services were on average $18.50 higher than CHN PID services (p = 0.01). Using physician estimates for WTP as the reference group, adolescents were willing to pay $56 more (95 % Cl : $48.6-$63.4) for physician care and parents were willing to pay $66 more (95 % Cl : $59.0-$72.8) than physician's predicted.

Conclusion: Adolescents and parents are willing to pay more for physician follow-up for PID, but they are open to CHN follow-up visits based on the mean WTP for CHN visits. Since WTP also reflects the value that individuals place on a service, our data demonstrate that providers consistently underestimate the value consumers place on clinical services for x adolescents with PID.

Abstract Image

了解消费者对患有盆腔炎的青少年护理的偏好。
目的:本研究的目的是估计消费者对医生和社区卫生护士(CHNs)随访PID服务的最大支付意愿(WTP),消费者类型(青少年与父母)的差异,以及卫生服务提供者预测的WTP消费者估计和实际消费者WTP估计的差异。方法:在这项经irb批准的研究中,采用条件评估方法收集青少年PID服务消费者(父母和青少年)和卫生服务提供者为临床服务提供而向医生或护士共同支付的WTP数据。消费者是从一个性传播感染高发的大型城市社区的一个学术儿科和青少年医学诊所和五个卫生部门校本卫生诊所招募的。参与者完成了一项基于网络的调查。数据采用线性回归分析。结果:青少年愿意比医生预测多支付36美元(95% Cl: 27.9 ~ 44.3美元),父母愿意多支付48美元(95% Cl: 40.3 ~ 57.4美元)。青少年和父母对医生和护理服务的WTP没有显著差异,消费者(青少年和父母)对医生PID服务的WTP平均比CHN PID服务高18.50美元(p = 0.01)。使用医生对WTP的估计作为参照组,青少年愿意为医生护理多支付56美元(95% Cl: 48.6- 63.4美元),父母愿意比医生预测多支付66美元(95% Cl: 59.0- 72.8美元)。结论:青少年和家长愿意支付更多的医生随访PID,但他们对CHN随访持开放态度,基于CHN就诊的平均WTP。由于WTP也反映了个人对服务的价值,我们的数据表明,提供者一直低估消费者对x名患有PID的青少年的临床服务的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信