Pretreatment predictors of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients receiving transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: a case control study.

Cancers of the head & neck Pub Date : 2016-07-04 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s41199-016-0008-7
Harry E Subramanian, Henry S Park, Andrea Barbieri, Amit Mahajan, Benjamin L Judson, Saral Mehra, Wendell G Yarbrough, Barbara A Burtness, Zain A Husain
{"title":"Pretreatment predictors of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients receiving transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: a case control study.","authors":"Harry E Subramanian,&nbsp;Henry S Park,&nbsp;Andrea Barbieri,&nbsp;Amit Mahajan,&nbsp;Benjamin L Judson,&nbsp;Saral Mehra,&nbsp;Wendell G Yarbrough,&nbsp;Barbara A Burtness,&nbsp;Zain A Husain","doi":"10.1186/s41199-016-0008-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative patient characteristics associated with the incidence of positive surgical margins or lymph node extracapsular extension (ECE), which necessitate adjuvant chemoradiation after transoral robotic surgery (TORS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single institution retrospective study of 34 consecutive patients with primary oropharyngeal cancer who underwent TORS. All imaging was reviewed by a single neuroradiologist. Surgical margins and ECE status were determined by a single head and neck pathologist. Associations of preoperative patient characteristics with positive surgical margins and lymph node ECE were examined using univariate analysis. Independent predictors of these outcomes were determined using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, the majority of patients had early-stage disease (7 cT1 and 21 cT2; 10 cN0). Positive margins occurred in 4 (12 %) patients. A clinically positive lymph node was seen in 23 (68 %) patients. Neck dissection was performed in 29 (85 %) patients, among whom 19 had a pathologically positive lymph node and 15 had nodal ECE. Logistic regression showed that larger preoperative lymph node size was an independent predictor of ECE (odds ratio, 13.32 [95 % CI, 1.46-121.43]). Among the 21 patients with a clinically positive lymph node who underwent neck dissection, ECE was present more often in patients with a preoperative node size ≥ 3.0 vs. < 3.0 cm (92 % vs. 44 %, <i>P</i> = 0.046). There was no patient characteristic associated with positive margins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a larger preoperative lymph node appear more likely to have ECE, and thus be treated with chemoradiation after TORS, with a potentially higher rate of toxicity. Lymph node size should be taken into account when deciding upon treatment approaches. Further research is needed to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":72518,"journal":{"name":"Cancers of the head & neck","volume":"1 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41199-016-0008-7","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers of the head & neck","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41199-016-0008-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative patient characteristics associated with the incidence of positive surgical margins or lymph node extracapsular extension (ECE), which necessitate adjuvant chemoradiation after transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Methods: We conducted a single institution retrospective study of 34 consecutive patients with primary oropharyngeal cancer who underwent TORS. All imaging was reviewed by a single neuroradiologist. Surgical margins and ECE status were determined by a single head and neck pathologist. Associations of preoperative patient characteristics with positive surgical margins and lymph node ECE were examined using univariate analysis. Independent predictors of these outcomes were determined using logistic regression.

Results: Preoperatively, the majority of patients had early-stage disease (7 cT1 and 21 cT2; 10 cN0). Positive margins occurred in 4 (12 %) patients. A clinically positive lymph node was seen in 23 (68 %) patients. Neck dissection was performed in 29 (85 %) patients, among whom 19 had a pathologically positive lymph node and 15 had nodal ECE. Logistic regression showed that larger preoperative lymph node size was an independent predictor of ECE (odds ratio, 13.32 [95 % CI, 1.46-121.43]). Among the 21 patients with a clinically positive lymph node who underwent neck dissection, ECE was present more often in patients with a preoperative node size ≥ 3.0 vs. < 3.0 cm (92 % vs. 44 %, P = 0.046). There was no patient characteristic associated with positive margins.

Conclusions: Patients with a larger preoperative lymph node appear more likely to have ECE, and thus be treated with chemoradiation after TORS, with a potentially higher rate of toxicity. Lymph node size should be taken into account when deciding upon treatment approaches. Further research is needed to validate these results.

接受经口机器人手术治疗口咽部鳞状细胞癌患者的辅助放化疗的预处理预测因素:一项病例对照研究。
背景:本研究的目的是确定术前患者与手术边缘或淋巴结囊外延伸(ECE)发生率相关的特征,这些特征需要在经口机器人手术(TORS)后进行辅助放化疗。方法:我们对连续34例接受TORS治疗的原发性口咽癌患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。所有的影像都由一名神经放射学家检查。手术边缘和ECE状态由一名头颈部病理学家确定。术前患者特征与手术切缘阳性和淋巴结ECE之间的关系采用单因素分析进行检验。使用逻辑回归确定这些结果的独立预测因子。结果:术前多数患者为早期病变(7例cT1, 21例cT2;10 cN0)。4例(12%)患者的切缘呈阳性。23例(68%)患者出现临床阳性淋巴结。29例(85%)患者进行了颈部清扫,其中19例淋巴结病理阳性,15例淋巴结ECE。Logistic回归显示术前淋巴结大小较大是ECE的独立预测因子(优势比为13.32 [95% CI, 1.46-121.43])。在21例临床淋巴结阳性患者行颈部清扫术中,术前淋巴结≥3.0 cm比< 3.0 cm的患者更常出现ECE(92%比44%,P = 0.046)。没有与阳性边缘相关的患者特征。结论:术前淋巴结较大的患者更容易发生ECE,因此在TORS后进行放化疗,可能具有更高的毒性。在决定治疗方法时应考虑淋巴结大小。需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信