Tools for the Measurement of Psychological Aspects of Organ Donation among the Families of Brain-dead People.

IF 0.3 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-05-01
S Ahmadian, M Khaghanizadeh, M H Zarghami, E Khaleghi, A Ebadi
{"title":"Tools for the Measurement of Psychological Aspects of Organ Donation among the Families of Brain-dead People.","authors":"S Ahmadian,&nbsp;M Khaghanizadeh,&nbsp;M H Zarghami,&nbsp;E Khaleghi,&nbsp;A Ebadi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the basic ethical principle of non-maleficence, organ procurement systems need to be accountable to donor families. As organ donation can be potentially traumatic, donor families are at risk of developing psychological damage. Appropriate measurement tools are needed to diagnose such disorders and develop appropriate treatment measures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the appropriateness of measurement tools and approaches used in previous studies for assessing donor families' psychological well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured online search was conducted in electronic databases namely <i>ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Ovid,</i> and <i>Web of Science</i>. The main inclusion criterion was the use of psychological assessment tools for data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10 studies were included in which different tools had been used for measuring donor families' psychological well-being in the following 5 dimensions: stress, depression, grief, general health, and positive legacy of trauma. The major pitfalls of the reviewed studies were failure to specifically assess complicated grief and differentiating it from other psychological disorders, diversity of the tools used for psychological well-being assessment, and lack of clear definitions of donor families' psychological well-being and its dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Donor families' psychological well-being is a complex and multidimensional concept and the existing measurement tools cannot accurately assess it. Therefore, the concept needs to be clearly explored and defined. Developing a comprehensive measurement tool or a set of scales is necessary for the early diagnosis of any impairment in donor families' psychological well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":14242,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine","volume":"9 2","pages":"53-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to the basic ethical principle of non-maleficence, organ procurement systems need to be accountable to donor families. As organ donation can be potentially traumatic, donor families are at risk of developing psychological damage. Appropriate measurement tools are needed to diagnose such disorders and develop appropriate treatment measures.

Objective: To examine the appropriateness of measurement tools and approaches used in previous studies for assessing donor families' psychological well-being.

Methods: A structured online search was conducted in electronic databases namely ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science. The main inclusion criterion was the use of psychological assessment tools for data collection.

Results: 10 studies were included in which different tools had been used for measuring donor families' psychological well-being in the following 5 dimensions: stress, depression, grief, general health, and positive legacy of trauma. The major pitfalls of the reviewed studies were failure to specifically assess complicated grief and differentiating it from other psychological disorders, diversity of the tools used for psychological well-being assessment, and lack of clear definitions of donor families' psychological well-being and its dimensions.

Conclusion: Donor families' psychological well-being is a complex and multidimensional concept and the existing measurement tools cannot accurately assess it. Therefore, the concept needs to be clearly explored and defined. Developing a comprehensive measurement tool or a set of scales is necessary for the early diagnosis of any impairment in donor families' psychological well-being.

Abstract Image

脑死亡患者家属器官捐献心理测量工具。
背景:根据非恶意的基本伦理原则,器官获取制度需要对供体家庭负责。由于器官捐赠可能带来潜在的创伤,捐赠家庭面临着心理伤害的风险。需要适当的测量工具来诊断这些疾病并制定适当的治疗措施。目的:检验以往研究中用于评估供体家庭心理健康的测量工具和方法的适宜性。方法:在ScienceDirect、PubMed、ProQuest、Scopus、Ovid、Web of Science等电子数据库中进行结构化在线检索。主要纳入标准是使用心理评估工具收集数据。结果:纳入了10项研究,其中使用了不同的工具来测量供体家庭在以下5个方面的心理健康:压力、抑郁、悲伤、一般健康和创伤的积极遗产。所审查的研究的主要缺陷是未能具体评估复杂悲伤并将其与其他心理障碍区分开来,用于心理健康评估的工具多样性,以及缺乏对捐赠者家庭心理健康及其维度的明确定义。结论:献血者家庭的心理健康是一个复杂的多维概念,现有的测量工具无法准确评估。因此,这个概念需要被清楚地探索和定义。开发一套全面的测量工具或一套量表对于早期诊断捐赠者家庭心理健康的任何损害是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine (IJOTM) is a quarterly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research on transplantation. The scope of the journal includes organ and tissue donation, procurement and preservation; surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties in all aspects of transplantation; genomics and immunobiology; immunosuppressive drugs and pharmacology relevant to transplantation; graft survival and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure; clinical trials and population analyses in the field of transplantation; transplant complications; cell and tissue transplantation; infection; post-transplant malignancies; sociological and ethical issues and xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信