Dance Functional Outcome Survey: Development and Preliminary Analyses.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2018-11-28 eCollection Date: 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-0729-3000
Shaw Bronner, Igor Reis Urbano
{"title":"Dance Functional Outcome Survey: Development and Preliminary Analyses.","authors":"Shaw Bronner, Igor Reis Urbano","doi":"10.1055/a-0729-3000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) was developed as a self-report questionnaire for healthy and injured ballet and modern dancers, focusing on the low back and lower extremities. Our aim was to determine factor analysis and internal consistency of the 16 items and to investigate test-retest and equivalence reliability and validity of the DFOS compared to three orthopedic outcomes instruments. Data were collected from 80 healthy and injured adult ballet and modern pre-professional and professional dancers. DFOS Likert-type and visual analog scales were completed twice within 4-9 days to study test-retest reliability. The Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Olerud and Molander Foot-Ankle Questionnaire, and Oswestry Disability Index were used to assess concurrent validity using intraclass correlation coefficients in SPSS, p<0.05. To determine instrument dimensions and internal consistency of the items, we conducted exploratory factor analysis and calculated Cronbach's α in JASP. DFOS demonstrated single factor loading and high Cronbach's α; high test-retest repeatability and equivalence reliability ( <i>r</i> =0.74-0.99) and acceptable criterion validity compared to the orthopedic outcomes instruments (r≥0.67). These results support further study of a revised 14 item Likert-version DFOS for repeatability, validity and responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"2 6","pages":"E191-E199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/2b/10-1055-a-0729-3000.PMC6277239.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0729-3000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) was developed as a self-report questionnaire for healthy and injured ballet and modern dancers, focusing on the low back and lower extremities. Our aim was to determine factor analysis and internal consistency of the 16 items and to investigate test-retest and equivalence reliability and validity of the DFOS compared to three orthopedic outcomes instruments. Data were collected from 80 healthy and injured adult ballet and modern pre-professional and professional dancers. DFOS Likert-type and visual analog scales were completed twice within 4-9 days to study test-retest reliability. The Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Olerud and Molander Foot-Ankle Questionnaire, and Oswestry Disability Index were used to assess concurrent validity using intraclass correlation coefficients in SPSS, p<0.05. To determine instrument dimensions and internal consistency of the items, we conducted exploratory factor analysis and calculated Cronbach's α in JASP. DFOS demonstrated single factor loading and high Cronbach's α; high test-retest repeatability and equivalence reliability ( r =0.74-0.99) and acceptable criterion validity compared to the orthopedic outcomes instruments (r≥0.67). These results support further study of a revised 14 item Likert-version DFOS for repeatability, validity and responsiveness.

舞蹈功能结果调查:开发与初步分析
舞蹈功能结果调查(DFOS)是为健康和受伤的芭蕾舞者和现代舞者开发的自我报告问卷,主要针对腰部和下肢。我们的目的是确定 16 个项目的因子分析和内部一致性,并研究 DFOS 与三种矫形结果工具相比的重测和等效可靠性和有效性。我们收集了 80 名健康和受伤的成年芭蕾舞者和现代舞预科生和专业舞者的数据。在 4-9 天内两次完成 DFOS 李克特量表和视觉模拟量表,以研究测试-再测可靠性。辛辛那提膝关节评分系统、Olerud 和 Molander 足踝问卷以及 Oswestry 残疾指数被用来评估并发效度(使用 SPSS 中的类内相关系数,pr =0.74-0.99),与矫形结果工具相比,标准效度(r≥0.67)是可以接受的。这些结果支持进一步研究修订后的 14 个项目李克特版 DFOS 的可重复性、有效性和响应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信