Interferon is associated with improved survival for node-positive cutaneous melanoma: a single-institution experience.

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Melanoma Management Pub Date : 2018-04-09 eCollection Date: 2018-06-01 DOI:10.2217/mmt-2017-0025
Daniel E Oliver, Vernon K Sondak, Tobin Strom, Jonathan S Zager, Arash O Naghavi, Amod Sarnaik, Jane L Messina, Jimmy J Caudell, Andy M Trotti, Javier F Torres-Roca, Nikhil I Khushalani, Louis B Harrison
{"title":"Interferon is associated with improved survival for node-positive cutaneous melanoma: a single-institution experience.","authors":"Daniel E Oliver,&nbsp;Vernon K Sondak,&nbsp;Tobin Strom,&nbsp;Jonathan S Zager,&nbsp;Arash O Naghavi,&nbsp;Amod Sarnaik,&nbsp;Jane L Messina,&nbsp;Jimmy J Caudell,&nbsp;Andy M Trotti,&nbsp;Javier F Torres-Roca,&nbsp;Nikhil I Khushalani,&nbsp;Louis B Harrison","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We assessed the role of adjuvant interferon on relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) in node-positive melanoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 385 node-positive patients without distant metastatic disease treated from 1998 to 2015. The surgery was therapeutic lymph node dissection (LND, n = 86) or sentinel lymph node biopsy ± completion LND (n = 270). 128 patients (33.2%) received adjuvant interferon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 70 months, interferon was associated with improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; p < 0.001), DMFS (HR: 0.59; p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.61; p = 0.003), controlling for tumor and nodal stage, node size, sex, primary site, adjuvant therapy and extracapsular extension. In an exploratory age-matched comparison of patients treated with (n = 67) and without (n = 233) adjuvant immunotherapy, interferon still showed improved RFS, DMFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant interferon appears to improve OS among node-positive melanoma patients in a modern experience, providing context for comparison in the adjuvant therapy landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0025","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: We assessed the role of adjuvant interferon on relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) in node-positive melanoma patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 385 node-positive patients without distant metastatic disease treated from 1998 to 2015. The surgery was therapeutic lymph node dissection (LND, n = 86) or sentinel lymph node biopsy ± completion LND (n = 270). 128 patients (33.2%) received adjuvant interferon.

Results: After a median follow-up of 70 months, interferon was associated with improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; p < 0.001), DMFS (HR: 0.59; p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.61; p = 0.003), controlling for tumor and nodal stage, node size, sex, primary site, adjuvant therapy and extracapsular extension. In an exploratory age-matched comparison of patients treated with (n = 67) and without (n = 233) adjuvant immunotherapy, interferon still showed improved RFS, DMFS and OS.

Conclusion: Adjuvant interferon appears to improve OS among node-positive melanoma patients in a modern experience, providing context for comparison in the adjuvant therapy landscape.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

干扰素与淋巴结阳性皮肤黑色素瘤生存率提高相关:单一机构经验
目的:我们评估了辅助干扰素对淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤患者无复发生存期(RFS)、无远处转移生存期(DMFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。方法:回顾性分析1998 - 2015年间385例无远处转移性肿瘤的淋巴结阳性患者。手术为治疗性淋巴结清扫(LND, n = 86)或前哨淋巴结活检±完成性淋巴结清扫(n = 270)。128例(33.2%)患者接受了辅助干扰素治疗。结果:中位随访70个月后,干扰素与RFS改善相关(风险比[HR]: 0.55;结论:在现代经验中,辅助干扰素似乎改善了淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤患者的OS,为辅助治疗领域的比较提供了背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Skin cancer is on the rise. According to the World Health Organization, 132,000 melanoma skin cancers occur globally each year. While early-stage melanoma is usually relatively easy to treat, once disease spreads prognosis worsens considerably. Therefore, research into combating advanced-stage melanoma is a high priority. New and emerging therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, B-RAF and KIT inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents and novel chemotherapy approaches hold promise for prolonging survival, but the search for a cure is ongoing. Melanoma Management publishes high-quality peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of melanoma, from prevention to diagnosis and from treatment of early-stage disease to late-stage melanoma and metastasis. The journal presents the latest research findings in melanoma research and treatment, together with authoritative reviews, cutting-edge editorials and perspectives that highlight hot topics and controversy in the field. Independent drug evaluations assess newly approved medications and their role in clinical practice. Key topics covered include: Risk factors, prevention and sun safety education Diagnosis, staging and grading Surgical excision of melanoma lesions Sentinel lymph node biopsy Biological therapies, including immunotherapy and vaccination Novel chemotherapy options Treatment of metastasis Prevention of recurrence Patient care and quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信