Electromyographic Activity of the Upper Limb in Three Hand Function Tests

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Natália Sanches Silva , Pedro Henrique Tavares Queiroz de Almeida , Paulo Vinícius Braga Mendes , Caio Sadao Medeiros Komino , José Marques Novo Jùnior , Daniel Marinho Cezar Da Cruz
{"title":"Electromyographic Activity of the Upper Limb in Three Hand Function Tests","authors":"Natália Sanches Silva ,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Tavares Queiroz de Almeida ,&nbsp;Paulo Vinícius Braga Mendes ,&nbsp;Caio Sadao Medeiros Komino ,&nbsp;José Marques Novo Jùnior ,&nbsp;Daniel Marinho Cezar Da Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>Occupational therapists usually assess hand function through standardised tests, however, there is no consensus on how the scores assigned to hand dexterity can accurately measure hand function required for daily activities and few studies evaluate the movement patterns of the upper limbs during hand function tests. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in muscle activation patterns during the performance of three hand dexterity tests.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty university students underwent a surface electromyographic (sEMG) assessment of eight upper limb muscles during the performance of the box and blocks test (BBT), nine-hole peg test (9HPT), and functional dexterity test (FDT). The description and comparison of each muscle activity during the test performance, gender differences, and the correlation between individual muscles' sEMG activity were analysed through appropriate statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Increased activity of proximal muscles was found during the performance of BBT (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). While a higher activation of the distal muscles occurred during the FDT and 9HPT performance, no differences were found between them. Comparisons of the sEMG activity revealed a significant increase in the muscle activation among women (<em>p</em> = .05). Strong and positive correlations (<em>r</em> &gt; .5; <em>p</em> &lt; .05) were observed between proximal and distal sEMG activities, suggesting a coordinate pattern of muscle activation during hand function tests.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results suggested the existence of differences in the muscle activation pattern during the performance of hand function evaluations. Occupational therapists should be aware of unique muscle requirements and its impact on the results of dexterity tests during hand function evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.11.003","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186116300110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective/Background

Occupational therapists usually assess hand function through standardised tests, however, there is no consensus on how the scores assigned to hand dexterity can accurately measure hand function required for daily activities and few studies evaluate the movement patterns of the upper limbs during hand function tests. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in muscle activation patterns during the performance of three hand dexterity tests.

Methods

Twenty university students underwent a surface electromyographic (sEMG) assessment of eight upper limb muscles during the performance of the box and blocks test (BBT), nine-hole peg test (9HPT), and functional dexterity test (FDT). The description and comparison of each muscle activity during the test performance, gender differences, and the correlation between individual muscles' sEMG activity were analysed through appropriate statistics.

Results

Increased activity of proximal muscles was found during the performance of BBT (p < .001). While a higher activation of the distal muscles occurred during the FDT and 9HPT performance, no differences were found between them. Comparisons of the sEMG activity revealed a significant increase in the muscle activation among women (p = .05). Strong and positive correlations (r > .5; p < .05) were observed between proximal and distal sEMG activities, suggesting a coordinate pattern of muscle activation during hand function tests.

Conclusion

The results suggested the existence of differences in the muscle activation pattern during the performance of hand function evaluations. Occupational therapists should be aware of unique muscle requirements and its impact on the results of dexterity tests during hand function evaluation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

三种手功能试验中上肢肌电图活动
目的/背景职业治疗师通常通过标准化测试来评估手功能,然而,关于手灵巧度的分数如何准确地衡量日常活动所需的手功能,并没有达成共识,很少有研究在手功能测试中评估上肢的运动模式。本研究旨在评估三种手部灵巧测试中肌肉激活模式的差异。方法采用表面肌电图(sEMG)对20名大学生在进行盒块测试(BBT)、九孔钉测试(9HPT)和功能灵巧性测试(FDT)时的8块上肢肌肉进行评估。通过适当的统计分析测试过程中各肌肉活动的描述和比较、性别差异以及单个肌肉肌电信号活动之间的相关性。结果在BBT运动过程中发现近端肌肉活动增加(p <措施)。虽然FDT和9HPT表现期间远端肌肉的激活程度较高,但两者之间没有发现差异。表面肌电活动的比较显示,女性的肌肉活动显著增加(p = 0.05)。强正相关(r >5;p & lt;在近端和远端肌电活动之间观察到0.05),表明手功能测试中肌肉激活的协调模式。结论在手功能评价中,肌肉激活模式存在差异。在手功能评估中,职业治疗师应该意识到独特的肌肉需求及其对灵巧测试结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信