Carious Lesion Diagnosis: Methods, Problems, Thresholds.

Q2 Dentistry
Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-05-24 DOI:10.1159/000487828
Klaus W Neuhaus, Adrian Lussi
{"title":"Carious Lesion Diagnosis: Methods, Problems, Thresholds.","authors":"Klaus W Neuhaus,&nbsp;Adrian Lussi","doi":"10.1159/000487828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The difference between carious lesion diagnosis and carious lesion detection is discussed here. Concerning carious lesions, 3 diagnostic requirements should be fulfilled: to detect lesions, to assess surface integrity, and to assess lesion activity to support clinical decision making. The first and most important diagnostic method is meticulous visual-tactile inspection. This is the only method that potentially contributes to all 3 diagnostic requirements. All other methods that are presented in this chapter, i.e., bitewing radiography, fluorescence-based technologies, and transillumination methods, are limited to assessing lesion depth in surfaces that are not visible to the eye and thus contribute to lesion detection only. At the end of the chapter, recent developments in objective lesion activity assessment are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000487828","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000487828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The difference between carious lesion diagnosis and carious lesion detection is discussed here. Concerning carious lesions, 3 diagnostic requirements should be fulfilled: to detect lesions, to assess surface integrity, and to assess lesion activity to support clinical decision making. The first and most important diagnostic method is meticulous visual-tactile inspection. This is the only method that potentially contributes to all 3 diagnostic requirements. All other methods that are presented in this chapter, i.e., bitewing radiography, fluorescence-based technologies, and transillumination methods, are limited to assessing lesion depth in surfaces that are not visible to the eye and thus contribute to lesion detection only. At the end of the chapter, recent developments in objective lesion activity assessment are presented.

龋齿诊断:方法、问题、阈值。
本文讨论了龋齿诊断与龋齿检测的区别。对于龋齿病变,应满足3个诊断要求:检测病变、评估表面完整性、评估病变活动性以支持临床决策。第一种也是最重要的诊断方法是细致的视触觉检查。这是唯一可能满足所有3种诊断要求的方法。本章中介绍的所有其他方法,即咬翼放射照相、基于荧光的技术和透照方法,仅限于评估眼睛不可见表面的病变深度,因此仅有助于病变检测。在本章的最后,介绍了客观病变活动评估的最新进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信