Stepwise Excavation.

Q2 Dentistry
Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-05-24 DOI:10.1159/000487834
Lars Bjørndal
{"title":"Stepwise Excavation.","authors":"Lars Bjørndal","doi":"10.1159/000487834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most recent inspiration for stepwise carious tissue removal in 2 stages originates from the knowhow on intralesion changes in deep carious lesions. The environmental change that takes place during the first stage of carious tissue removal is aiming for the arrest of the deep lesion, by placing a temporary restoration on top of the soft carious dentine. The cavity is optimised during the second stage for a final restoration, as potential shrinkage of the retained dentine may occur during the period of carious dentine arrestment. However, basic clinical limitations on the objective evaluation of pulp inflammation creates dilemmas in treating the deep lesions. Also, a global consensus is lacking for the definition of a so-called deep lesion. Finally, an optimal evidence goal for choosing the best approach for deep lesion treatment in adults has still not been fully defined. Taken together, it may not be a surprise that treatment variation is reported amongst general dental practitioners on deep caries treatment. Here, facts are presented supporting the treatment, including some drawbacks, as well as updated guidelines for the procedure. Recent clinical high evidence data from randomised clinical trials significantly favour the stepwise approach as a predictable and reliable treatment for well-defined deep carious lesions located in the pulpal quarter of the dentine in terms of avoiding pulp exposure, keeping the tooth vital and without the development of apical pathosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000487834","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000487834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The most recent inspiration for stepwise carious tissue removal in 2 stages originates from the knowhow on intralesion changes in deep carious lesions. The environmental change that takes place during the first stage of carious tissue removal is aiming for the arrest of the deep lesion, by placing a temporary restoration on top of the soft carious dentine. The cavity is optimised during the second stage for a final restoration, as potential shrinkage of the retained dentine may occur during the period of carious dentine arrestment. However, basic clinical limitations on the objective evaluation of pulp inflammation creates dilemmas in treating the deep lesions. Also, a global consensus is lacking for the definition of a so-called deep lesion. Finally, an optimal evidence goal for choosing the best approach for deep lesion treatment in adults has still not been fully defined. Taken together, it may not be a surprise that treatment variation is reported amongst general dental practitioners on deep caries treatment. Here, facts are presented supporting the treatment, including some drawbacks, as well as updated guidelines for the procedure. Recent clinical high evidence data from randomised clinical trials significantly favour the stepwise approach as a predictable and reliable treatment for well-defined deep carious lesions located in the pulpal quarter of the dentine in terms of avoiding pulp exposure, keeping the tooth vital and without the development of apical pathosis.

分段开挖。
最近对分两阶段逐步去除的灵感来自于对深部龋齿病变病变内变化的了解。在龋齿组织去除的第一阶段发生的环境变化旨在通过在柔软的龋齿牙本质上放置临时修复物来阻止深层病变。在第二阶段进行最终修复时,由于牙本质阻滞期间可能发生保留的牙本质的潜在收缩,因此在第二阶段对牙腔进行优化。然而,临床对牙髓炎症客观评价的基本限制,给治疗深部病变带来了困境。此外,对于所谓的深部病变的定义也缺乏全球共识。最后,选择成人深部病变最佳治疗方法的最佳证据目标仍未完全确定。综上所述,在普通牙科医生中,深度龋齿治疗方法的差异可能并不令人惊讶。在这里,事实提出支持治疗,包括一些缺点,以及更新的指导方针的程序。近期来自随机临床试验的临床高证据数据显著支持分步法作为一种可预测和可靠的治疗方法,以避免牙髓暴露,保持牙齿的生命和不发展根尖病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信