Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for the presence of coronary artery ectasia in patients with aortic aneurysms

Hiroki Ikenaga , Satoshi Kurisu , Noriaki Watanabe , Takashi Shimonaga , Tadanao Higaki , Toshitaka Iwasaki , Hiroto Utsunomiya , Naoya Mitsuba , Ken Ishibashi , Yoshihiro Dohi , Yukihiro Fukuda , Katsuhiko Imai , Taijiro Sueda , Yasuki Kihara
{"title":"Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for the presence of coronary artery ectasia in patients with aortic aneurysms","authors":"Hiroki Ikenaga ,&nbsp;Satoshi Kurisu ,&nbsp;Noriaki Watanabe ,&nbsp;Takashi Shimonaga ,&nbsp;Tadanao Higaki ,&nbsp;Toshitaka Iwasaki ,&nbsp;Hiroto Utsunomiya ,&nbsp;Naoya Mitsuba ,&nbsp;Ken Ishibashi ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Dohi ,&nbsp;Yukihiro Fukuda ,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Imai ,&nbsp;Taijiro Sueda ,&nbsp;Yasuki Kihara","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Both aortic aneurysms and coronary artery ectasia (CAE) frequently coexist and are associated with more pronounced inflammation. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NL ratio) is widely used as a marker of inflammation. However, relation between CAE and NL ratio in patients with aortic aneurysms is not fully understood. This study was undertaken to assess relation between CAE and NL ratio in patients with aortic aneurysms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study consisted of 93 consecutive patients with aortic aneurysms (AA group) and 79 patients without aortic aneurysms who had angiographically normal coronary arteries as the control group. Moreover, patients with aortic aneurysms were classified into two groups based on the presence of CAE; CAE (+) group (n = 44) and CAE (−) group (n = 49). We compared blood chemical parameters in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the AA group, 44 patients (47.3%) had CAE. The AA group had a significantly higher NL ratio than the control group (2.93 ± 1.43 vs. 2.45 ± 1.05, p = 0.027). Furthermore, the CAE (+) group had a significantly higher NL ratio than the CAE (−) group (3.39 ± 1.67 vs. 2.52 ± 1.04, p &lt; 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the high NL ratio was an independent predictor for CAE in patients with aortic aneurysms (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.24–2.69, p = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with aortic aneurysms had a significantly higher NL ratio than those without aortic aneurysms. Furthermore, the NL ratio might predict the presence of CAE in patients with aortic aneurysms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90542,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.08.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214763214000601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Both aortic aneurysms and coronary artery ectasia (CAE) frequently coexist and are associated with more pronounced inflammation. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NL ratio) is widely used as a marker of inflammation. However, relation between CAE and NL ratio in patients with aortic aneurysms is not fully understood. This study was undertaken to assess relation between CAE and NL ratio in patients with aortic aneurysms.

Methods

This study consisted of 93 consecutive patients with aortic aneurysms (AA group) and 79 patients without aortic aneurysms who had angiographically normal coronary arteries as the control group. Moreover, patients with aortic aneurysms were classified into two groups based on the presence of CAE; CAE (+) group (n = 44) and CAE (−) group (n = 49). We compared blood chemical parameters in both groups.

Results

In the AA group, 44 patients (47.3%) had CAE. The AA group had a significantly higher NL ratio than the control group (2.93 ± 1.43 vs. 2.45 ± 1.05, p = 0.027). Furthermore, the CAE (+) group had a significantly higher NL ratio than the CAE (−) group (3.39 ± 1.67 vs. 2.52 ± 1.04, p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the high NL ratio was an independent predictor for CAE in patients with aortic aneurysms (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.24–2.69, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with aortic aneurysms had a significantly higher NL ratio than those without aortic aneurysms. Furthermore, the NL ratio might predict the presence of CAE in patients with aortic aneurysms.

Abstract Image

中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对主动脉瘤患者冠状动脉扩张的预测价值
背景:主动脉瘤和冠状动脉扩张(CAE)经常共存,并伴有更明显的炎症。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NL比率)被广泛用作炎症的标志物。然而,主动脉瘤患者CAE与NL比值的关系尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在评估主动脉瘤患者CAE与NL比值的关系。方法选取连续93例主动脉瘤患者(AA组)和79例冠状动脉造影正常的非主动脉瘤患者作为对照组。根据是否存在CAE将主动脉瘤患者分为两组;CAE(+)组(n = 44)和CAE(-)组(n = 49)。比较两组患者血液化学指标。结果AA组发生CAE 44例,占47.3%。AA组NL比显著高于对照组(2.93±1.43比2.45±1.05,p = 0.027)。CAE(+)组NL比值显著高于CAE(-)组(3.39±1.67∶2.52±1.04,p <0.01)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,高NL比是主动脉瘤患者CAE的独立预测因子(优势比1.76,95%可信区间1.24 ~ 2.69,p = 0.001)。结论有主动脉瘤患者的NL率明显高于无主动脉瘤患者。此外,NL比值可以预测主动脉瘤患者是否存在CAE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信