Improving Surgical and Anaesthesia Practice: Review of the Use of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Ethiopia.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-03-01 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u207104.w6251
Ryan Ellis, Ahmad Izzuddin Mohamad Nor, Iona Pimentil, Zebenaye Bitew, Jolene Moore
{"title":"Improving Surgical and Anaesthesia Practice: Review of the Use of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Ethiopia.","authors":"Ryan Ellis,&nbsp;Ahmad Izzuddin Mohamad Nor,&nbsp;Iona Pimentil,&nbsp;Zebenaye Bitew,&nbsp;Jolene Moore","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality.u207104.w6251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Development of surgical and anaesthetic care globally has been consistently reported as being inadequate. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery highlights the need for action to address this deficit. One such action to improve global surgical safety is the introduction of the WHO Surgical Checklist to Operating Rooms (OR) around the world. The checklist has a growing body of evidence supporting its ability to assist in the delivery of safe anaesthesia and surgical care. Here we report the introduction of the Checklist to a major Ethiopian referral hospital and low-resource setting and highlight the success and challenges of its implementation over a one year period. This project was conducted between July 2015 and August 2016, within a wider partnership between Felege Hiwot Hospital and The University of Aberdeen. The WHO Surgical Checklist was modified for appropriate and locally specific use within the OR of Felege Hiwot. The modified Checklist was introduced to all OR's and staff instructed on its use by local surgical leaders. Assessment of use of the Checklist was performed for General Surgical OR in three phases and Obstetric OR in two phases via observational study and case note review. Training was conduct between each phase to address challenges and promote use. Checklist utilisation in the general OR increased between Phase I and 2 from 50% to 97% and remained high at 94% in Phase 3. Between Phase I and 2 partial completion rose from 27% to 77%, whereas full completion remained unchanged (23% to 20%). Phase 3 resulted in an increase in full completion from 20% to 60%. After 1 year the least completed section was \"Sign In\" (53%) and \"Time Out\" was most completed (87%). The most poorly checked item was \"Site Marked\" (60%). Use of the checklist in Obstetrics OR increased between Phase I and Phase II from 50% to 100% with some improvement in partial completion (50% to 60%) and a notable increase in full completion (0% to 40%). The least completed section was \"Time Out\" (50%) and \"Sign In\" was the most completed (90%). The most poorly checked item was \"Recovery Concerns\" (70%). There was considerable enthusiasm for use of the checklist among staff. The greatest challenge was communication difficulties between teams and high staff turnover. This study records a locally driven, successful introduction of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist modified for the specific locale and illustrates an increase in use of the checklist over a one year period in both General Surgical and Obstetric OR's. Local determination and ownership of the Checklist with regular intervention to promote use and train users contributed to this success.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality.u207104.w6251","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u207104.w6251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Development of surgical and anaesthetic care globally has been consistently reported as being inadequate. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery highlights the need for action to address this deficit. One such action to improve global surgical safety is the introduction of the WHO Surgical Checklist to Operating Rooms (OR) around the world. The checklist has a growing body of evidence supporting its ability to assist in the delivery of safe anaesthesia and surgical care. Here we report the introduction of the Checklist to a major Ethiopian referral hospital and low-resource setting and highlight the success and challenges of its implementation over a one year period. This project was conducted between July 2015 and August 2016, within a wider partnership between Felege Hiwot Hospital and The University of Aberdeen. The WHO Surgical Checklist was modified for appropriate and locally specific use within the OR of Felege Hiwot. The modified Checklist was introduced to all OR's and staff instructed on its use by local surgical leaders. Assessment of use of the Checklist was performed for General Surgical OR in three phases and Obstetric OR in two phases via observational study and case note review. Training was conduct between each phase to address challenges and promote use. Checklist utilisation in the general OR increased between Phase I and 2 from 50% to 97% and remained high at 94% in Phase 3. Between Phase I and 2 partial completion rose from 27% to 77%, whereas full completion remained unchanged (23% to 20%). Phase 3 resulted in an increase in full completion from 20% to 60%. After 1 year the least completed section was "Sign In" (53%) and "Time Out" was most completed (87%). The most poorly checked item was "Site Marked" (60%). Use of the checklist in Obstetrics OR increased between Phase I and Phase II from 50% to 100% with some improvement in partial completion (50% to 60%) and a notable increase in full completion (0% to 40%). The least completed section was "Time Out" (50%) and "Sign In" was the most completed (90%). The most poorly checked item was "Recovery Concerns" (70%). There was considerable enthusiasm for use of the checklist among staff. The greatest challenge was communication difficulties between teams and high staff turnover. This study records a locally driven, successful introduction of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist modified for the specific locale and illustrates an increase in use of the checklist over a one year period in both General Surgical and Obstetric OR's. Local determination and ownership of the Checklist with regular intervention to promote use and train users contributed to this success.

改进手术和麻醉实践:对埃塞俄比亚费利格·希沃特转诊医院使用世卫组织安全手术清单的审查。
全球外科和麻醉护理的发展一直被认为是不足的。《柳叶刀》全球外科学委员会强调需要采取行动解决这一缺陷。改善全球手术安全的一项此类行动是在世界各地的手术室引入世卫组织手术清单。越来越多的证据支持该清单能够协助提供安全的麻醉和手术护理。在此,我们报告了在资源匮乏的埃塞俄比亚一家主要转诊医院推行核对表的情况,并着重介绍了在一年时间内实施核对表所取得的成功和面临的挑战。该项目于2015年7月至2016年8月期间进行,在菲利格希沃特医院和阿伯丁大学之间进行了更广泛的合作。世卫组织手术检查表进行了修改,以便在Hiwot学院手术室中适当和局部具体使用。修改后的检查表被介绍给所有的手术室和工作人员,由当地外科领导指导使用。通过观察性研究和病例记录回顾,对普通外科手术室和产科手术室进行了三个阶段和两个阶段的清单使用评估。在每个阶段之间进行培训,以应对挑战和促进使用。一般手术室的检查表使用率在第一阶段和第二阶段之间从50%增加到97%,在第三阶段保持在94%的高位。在第一阶段和第二阶段之间,部分完井率从27%上升到77%,而完全完井率保持不变(23%到20%)。第三阶段将完成率从20%提高到60%。1年后,完成最少的部分是“Sign In”(53%),完成最多的部分是“Time Out”(87%)。最糟糕的检查项目是“网站标记”(60%)。从第一阶段到第二阶段,产科手术室的检查表使用率从50%增加到100%,部分完成率(50%到60%)有所改善,完全完成率显著增加(0%到40%)。完成度最低的部分是“超时”(50%),完成度最高的部分是“登录”(90%)。最糟糕的是“恢复问题”(70%)。工作人员对使用核对表有相当大的热情。最大的挑战是团队之间的沟通困难和人员流动率高。本研究记录了在当地推动下成功引入针对特定地区修改的世卫组织手术安全核对表的情况,并说明了一年来在普通外科和产科手术室中使用核对表的情况有所增加。当地对检查表的决心和所有权,加上定期的干预,以促进使用和培训用户,促成了这一成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信