Absence of prenatal ultrasound surveillance: Data from the Portuguese congenital anomalies registry

Q Medicine
Sandrina Correia, Ausenda Machado, Paula Braz, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Carlos Matias-Dias
{"title":"Absence of prenatal ultrasound surveillance: Data from the Portuguese congenital anomalies registry","authors":"Sandrina Correia,&nbsp;Ausenda Machado,&nbsp;Paula Braz,&nbsp;Ana Paula Rodrigues,&nbsp;Carlos Matias-Dias","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In Portugal, prenatal care guidelines advocate two prenatal ultrasound scans for all pregnant women. Not following this recommendation is considered inadequate prenatal surveillance. The National Registry of Congenital Anomalies (RENAC in Portuguese) is an active population-based registry and an important instrument for the epidemiological surveillance of congenital anomalies (CA) in Portugal. Regarding pregnancies with CA, this study aims to describe the epidemiology of absent prenatal ultrasound scans and factors associated with this inadequate surveillance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional comparative study from 2008 to 2013 was carried out using data from RENAC. Associations of nonuptake of prenatal ultrasound screening with socio-demographic health behaviors and obstetric history data were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. Potential confounders were investigated and included if they changed the crude odds ratio estimate by at least 10% after adjustment by the Mantel-Haenszel method. The statistical significance level was set at 5%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 6090 notifications of congenital anomalies were reported to RENAC, and 2% of the pregnant women reported no prenatal ultrasound screening surveillance. These women were on average aged 30.0 years, and 52.8% had no professional occupation. The odds of not performing an ultrasound scan during their pregnancy increased 2.47 times with lack of professional activity, 4.67 times in non-Caucasian women, and decreased 46% for any previous miscarriage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For pregnant women who did not receive an ultrasound screening examination during pregnancy, the strongest statistically associated factors were professional occupation, ethnicity, and number of miscarriages in previous gestations. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:489–493, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23530","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

In Portugal, prenatal care guidelines advocate two prenatal ultrasound scans for all pregnant women. Not following this recommendation is considered inadequate prenatal surveillance. The National Registry of Congenital Anomalies (RENAC in Portuguese) is an active population-based registry and an important instrument for the epidemiological surveillance of congenital anomalies (CA) in Portugal. Regarding pregnancies with CA, this study aims to describe the epidemiology of absent prenatal ultrasound scans and factors associated with this inadequate surveillance.

Methods

A cross-sectional comparative study from 2008 to 2013 was carried out using data from RENAC. Associations of nonuptake of prenatal ultrasound screening with socio-demographic health behaviors and obstetric history data were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. Potential confounders were investigated and included if they changed the crude odds ratio estimate by at least 10% after adjustment by the Mantel-Haenszel method. The statistical significance level was set at 5%.

Results

Overall, 6090 notifications of congenital anomalies were reported to RENAC, and 2% of the pregnant women reported no prenatal ultrasound screening surveillance. These women were on average aged 30.0 years, and 52.8% had no professional occupation. The odds of not performing an ultrasound scan during their pregnancy increased 2.47 times with lack of professional activity, 4.67 times in non-Caucasian women, and decreased 46% for any previous miscarriage.

Conclusion

For pregnant women who did not receive an ultrasound screening examination during pregnancy, the strongest statistically associated factors were professional occupation, ethnicity, and number of miscarriages in previous gestations. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:489–493, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

缺乏产前超声监测:来自葡萄牙先天性异常登记处的数据
在葡萄牙,产前护理指南提倡对所有孕妇进行两次产前超声扫描。不遵循这一建议被认为是不充分的产前监测。葡萄牙国家先天性异常登记处(RENAC)是一个活跃的以人口为基础的登记处,也是葡萄牙先天性异常(CA)流行病学监测的重要工具。对于患有CA的妊娠,本研究旨在描述缺乏产前超声扫描的流行病学以及与这种监测不足相关的因素。方法采用2008 - 2013年RENAC数据进行横断面对比研究。使用多元逻辑回归评估未接受产前超声筛查与社会人口健康行为和产科史数据的关系。经Mantel-Haenszel方法校正后,若潜在混杂因素使粗比值比估计改变至少10%,则调查并纳入。统计学显著性水平设为5%。结果共向RENAC报告了6090例先天性异常,2%的孕妇没有产前超声筛查监测。这些女性的平均年龄为30.0岁,52.8%的女性没有专业职业。怀孕期间未进行超声扫描的几率因缺乏专业活动而增加了2.47倍,非高加索女性增加了4.67倍,而之前有过流产的女性则减少了46%。结论妊娠期未接受超声筛查的孕妇,职业、种族和既往妊娠流产次数是影响妊娠的最重要因素。出生缺陷研究(A辑)(06):489 - 493,2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信