Characterisation of Exposure to Ultrafine Particles from Surgical Smoke by Use of a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer.

Annals of Occupational Hygiene Pub Date : 2016-08-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-02 DOI:10.1093/annhyg/mew033
Siri Fenstad Ragde, Rikke Bramming Jørgensen, Solveig Føreland
{"title":"Characterisation of Exposure to Ultrafine Particles from Surgical Smoke by Use of a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer.","authors":"Siri Fenstad Ragde,&nbsp;Rikke Bramming Jørgensen,&nbsp;Solveig Føreland","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mew033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electrosurgery is a method based on a high frequency current used to cut tissue and coagulate small blood vessels during surgery. Surgical smoke is generated due to the heat created by electrosurgery. The carcinogenic potential of this smoke was assumed already in the 1980's and there has been a growing interest in the potential adverse health effects of exposure to the particles in surgical smoke. Surgical smoke is known to contain ultrafine particles (UFPs) but the knowledge about the exposure to UFPs produced by electrosurgery is however sparse. The aims of the study were therefore to characterise the exposure to UFPs in surgical smoke during different types of surgical procedures and on different job groups in the operating room, and to characterise the particle size distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Personal exposure measurements were performed on main surgeon, assistant surgeon, surgical nurse, and anaesthetic nurse during five different surgical procedures [nephrectomy, breast reduction surgery, abdominoplasty, hip replacement surgery, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)]. The measurements were performed with a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS) to assess the exposure to UPFs and to characterize the particle size distribution. Possible predictors of exposure were investigated using Linear Mixed Effect Models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exposure to UFPs was highest during abdominoplasty arithmetic mean (AM) 3900 particles cm(-3) and lowest during hip replacement surgeries AM 400 particles cm(-3). The different job groups had similar exposure during the same types of surgical procedures. The use of electrosurgery resulted in short term high peak exposure (highest maximum peak value 272 000 particles cm(-3)) to mainly UFPs. The size distribution of particles varied between the different types of surgical procedures, where nephrectomy, hip replacement surgery, and TURP produced UFPs with a dominating mode of 9nm while breast reduction surgery and abdominoplasty produced UFPs with a dominating mode of 70 and 81nm, respectively. Type of surgery was the strongest predictor of exposure. When only including breast reduction surgery in the analysis, the use of one or two ES pencils during surgery was a significant predictor of exposure. When only including hip replacement surgery, the operating room was a significant predictor of exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of electrosurgery resulted in short-term high peak exposures to mainly UFPs in surgical smoke. Type of surgery was the strongest predictor of exposure and the different types of surgical procedures produced different sized particles. The job groups had similar exposure. Compared to other occupational exposures to UFPs involving hot processes, the personal exposure levels for UFPs were low during the use of electrosurgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8458,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Occupational Hygiene","volume":"60 7","pages":"860-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/annhyg/mew033","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Occupational Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Introduction: Electrosurgery is a method based on a high frequency current used to cut tissue and coagulate small blood vessels during surgery. Surgical smoke is generated due to the heat created by electrosurgery. The carcinogenic potential of this smoke was assumed already in the 1980's and there has been a growing interest in the potential adverse health effects of exposure to the particles in surgical smoke. Surgical smoke is known to contain ultrafine particles (UFPs) but the knowledge about the exposure to UFPs produced by electrosurgery is however sparse. The aims of the study were therefore to characterise the exposure to UFPs in surgical smoke during different types of surgical procedures and on different job groups in the operating room, and to characterise the particle size distribution.

Methods: Personal exposure measurements were performed on main surgeon, assistant surgeon, surgical nurse, and anaesthetic nurse during five different surgical procedures [nephrectomy, breast reduction surgery, abdominoplasty, hip replacement surgery, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)]. The measurements were performed with a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS) to assess the exposure to UPFs and to characterize the particle size distribution. Possible predictors of exposure were investigated using Linear Mixed Effect Models.

Results: The exposure to UFPs was highest during abdominoplasty arithmetic mean (AM) 3900 particles cm(-3) and lowest during hip replacement surgeries AM 400 particles cm(-3). The different job groups had similar exposure during the same types of surgical procedures. The use of electrosurgery resulted in short term high peak exposure (highest maximum peak value 272 000 particles cm(-3)) to mainly UFPs. The size distribution of particles varied between the different types of surgical procedures, where nephrectomy, hip replacement surgery, and TURP produced UFPs with a dominating mode of 9nm while breast reduction surgery and abdominoplasty produced UFPs with a dominating mode of 70 and 81nm, respectively. Type of surgery was the strongest predictor of exposure. When only including breast reduction surgery in the analysis, the use of one or two ES pencils during surgery was a significant predictor of exposure. When only including hip replacement surgery, the operating room was a significant predictor of exposure.

Conclusion: The use of electrosurgery resulted in short-term high peak exposures to mainly UFPs in surgical smoke. Type of surgery was the strongest predictor of exposure and the different types of surgical procedures produced different sized particles. The job groups had similar exposure. Compared to other occupational exposures to UFPs involving hot processes, the personal exposure levels for UFPs were low during the use of electrosurgery.

使用快速迁移度粒度仪对手术烟雾中超细颗粒的暴露进行表征。
简介:电外科手术是一种基于高频电流的方法,在手术过程中用于切割组织和凝固小血管。手术烟雾是由电手术产生的热量产生的。这种烟雾的致癌潜力早在20世纪80年代就已被假定,并且人们对接触手术烟雾中的颗粒可能对健康造成的不利影响越来越感兴趣。众所周知,外科手术烟雾中含有超细颗粒(ufp),但关于电外科手术产生的超细颗粒暴露的知识却很少。因此,该研究的目的是描述在不同类型的外科手术过程中,以及手术室中不同工作人群在手术烟雾中暴露于ufp的特征,并描述颗粒大小分布。方法:对5种不同手术过程(肾切除术、缩胸术、腹部成形术、髋关节置换术和经尿道前列腺切除术)中主外科医生、助理外科医生、手术护士和麻醉护士进行个人暴露测量。使用快速迁移率粒度仪(FMPS)进行测量,以评估upf暴露情况并表征粒径分布。使用线性混合效应模型对暴露的可能预测因素进行了调查。结果:ufp暴露量在腹部成形术期间最高,为3900颗粒cm(-3),在髋关节置换术期间最低,为400颗粒cm(-3)。在相同类型的外科手术过程中,不同工作组的暴露程度相似。电外科手术的使用导致短期高峰值暴露(最高峰值272 000粒子厘米(-3)),主要是ufp。不同类型手术的颗粒大小分布不同,其中肾切除术、髋关节置换术和TURP产生的ufp以9nm为主导模式,而缩胸手术和腹部成形术产生的ufp分别以70和81nm为主导模式。手术类型是暴露的最强预测因子。当分析中只包括缩胸手术时,手术期间使用一到两支ES铅笔是暴露的重要预测因素。当仅包括髋关节置换手术时,手术室是暴露的重要预测因子。结论:电外科的使用导致手术烟雾中ufp的短期高峰暴露。手术类型是暴露的最强预测因子,不同类型的手术过程产生不同大小的颗粒。工作组的暴露程度相似。与涉及热过程的其他职业ufp暴露相比,在使用电外科手术期间ufp的个人暴露水平较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信