In the Nick of Time: Using the Reasonable Promptness Provision to Challenge Medicaid Spending Cutbacks.

Jeffrey Chen
{"title":"In the Nick of Time: Using the Reasonable Promptness Provision to Challenge Medicaid Spending Cutbacks.","authors":"Jeffrey Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because agency enforcement of the Medicaid statute against non-compliant states is utterly impractical, Medicaid providers and beneficiaries have relied on section 1983 litigation to protect themselves against the harmful effects of state cutbacks on Medicaid spending by privately enforcing two particular provisions of the Medicaid statute against the states. However, because of several legislative and judicial decisions, private litigants can no longer use these provisions to challenge low Medicaid reimbursement rates. This Note proposes and evaluates an alternative method of resisting state Medicaid spending cutbacks: enforcing the Reasonable Promptness Provision of the Medicaid statute through section 1983.</p>","PeriodicalId":85893,"journal":{"name":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","volume":"15 2","pages":"349-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because agency enforcement of the Medicaid statute against non-compliant states is utterly impractical, Medicaid providers and beneficiaries have relied on section 1983 litigation to protect themselves against the harmful effects of state cutbacks on Medicaid spending by privately enforcing two particular provisions of the Medicaid statute against the states. However, because of several legislative and judicial decisions, private litigants can no longer use these provisions to challenge low Medicaid reimbursement rates. This Note proposes and evaluates an alternative method of resisting state Medicaid spending cutbacks: enforcing the Reasonable Promptness Provision of the Medicaid statute through section 1983.

关键时刻:利用合理的及时性条款挑战医疗补助支出削减。
由于针对不合规州的医疗补助法规的机构执行是完全不切实际的,医疗补助提供者和受益人依靠1983年部分诉讼来保护自己免受国家削减医疗补助支出的有害影响,通过私下执行医疗补助法规的两个特定条款来针对州。然而,由于几项立法和司法决定,私人诉讼当事人不能再使用这些条款来挑战低医疗补助报销率。本文提出并评估了一种抵制州医疗补助支出削减的替代方法:通过1983节执行医疗补助法规的合理及时条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信