Inernational research in health care management: its need in the 21st century, methodological challenges, ethical issues, pitfalls, and practicalities.

Q4 Medicine
Sandra C Buttigieg, Cheryl Rathert, Thomas A D'Aunno, Grant T Savage
{"title":"Inernational research in health care management: its need in the 21st century, methodological challenges, ethical issues, pitfalls, and practicalities.","authors":"Sandra C Buttigieg,&nbsp;Cheryl Rathert,&nbsp;Thomas A D'Aunno,&nbsp;Grant T Savage","doi":"10.1108/s1474-823120140000017001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This commentary argues in favor of international research in the 21st century. Advances in technology, science, communication, transport, and infrastructure have transformed the world into a global village. Industries have increasingly adopted globalization strategies. Likewise, the health sector is more internationalized whereby comparisons between diverse health systems, international best practices, international benchmarking, cross-border health care, and cross-cultural issues have become important subjects in the health care literature. The focus has now turned to international, collaborative, cross-national, and cross-cultural research, which is by far more demanding than domestic studies. In this commentary, we explore the methodological challenges, ethical issues, pitfalls, and practicalities within international research and offer possible solutions to address them.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The commentary synthesizes contributions from four scholars in the field of health care management, who came together during the annual meeting of the Academy of Management to discuss with members of the Health Care Management Division the challenges of international research.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>International research is worth pursuing; however, it calls for scholarly attention to key methodological and ethical issues for its success.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This commentary addresses salient issues pertaining to international research in one comprehensive account.</p>","PeriodicalId":35465,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Care Management","volume":"17 ","pages":"3-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/s1474-823120140000017001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-823120140000017001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: This commentary argues in favor of international research in the 21st century. Advances in technology, science, communication, transport, and infrastructure have transformed the world into a global village. Industries have increasingly adopted globalization strategies. Likewise, the health sector is more internationalized whereby comparisons between diverse health systems, international best practices, international benchmarking, cross-border health care, and cross-cultural issues have become important subjects in the health care literature. The focus has now turned to international, collaborative, cross-national, and cross-cultural research, which is by far more demanding than domestic studies. In this commentary, we explore the methodological challenges, ethical issues, pitfalls, and practicalities within international research and offer possible solutions to address them.

Design/methodology/approach: The commentary synthesizes contributions from four scholars in the field of health care management, who came together during the annual meeting of the Academy of Management to discuss with members of the Health Care Management Division the challenges of international research.

Findings: International research is worth pursuing; however, it calls for scholarly attention to key methodological and ethical issues for its success.

Originality/value: This commentary addresses salient issues pertaining to international research in one comprehensive account.

医疗保健管理的国际研究:21世纪的需要、方法论挑战、伦理问题、陷阱和实用性。
目的:本评论支持21世纪的国际研究。技术、科学、通信、交通和基础设施的进步使世界变成了一个地球村。各行各业越来越多地采用全球化战略。同样,卫生部门更加国际化,因此不同卫生系统之间的比较、国际最佳做法、国际基准、跨境卫生保健和跨文化问题已成为卫生保健文献中的重要主题。现在的研究重点已经转向国际、合作、跨国和跨文化的研究,这比国内的研究要求高得多。在这篇评论中,我们探讨了国际研究中的方法论挑战、伦理问题、陷阱和实用性,并提供了解决这些问题的可能解决方案。设计/方法/方法:该评论综合了四位卫生保健管理领域的学者的贡献,他们在管理学会年会上聚集在一起,与卫生保健管理司的成员讨论国际研究的挑战。研究结果:值得进行国际研究;然而,它要求学术界关注其成功的关键方法和伦理问题。原创性/价值:这篇评论在一个全面的账户中解决了与国际研究有关的突出问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Health Care Management
Advances in Health Care Management Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信