Medicine, law and human rights - a symbiotic relationship.

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
MEDICINE AND LAW Pub Date : 2014-04-01
Nikola Tupanceski, Dragana Kiprijanovska
{"title":"Medicine, law and human rights - a symbiotic relationship.","authors":"Nikola Tupanceski,&nbsp;Dragana Kiprijanovska","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Law and medicine are separate professions, and attorneys and physicians often see their professions in conflict. There are, however, more similarities than differences between the two professions. And there are areas of mutual concern and overlap that demand the application of both legal and medical knowledge for the good of the society. In the new categorical system of values, which is substantially influenced by the so-called modern or aggressive medicine, clever physicians, researchers, and technicians discover newer and better ways to do things. Often, what science and technology make possible soon becomes permissible and, eventually, normal and expected. Given the rapid advances in technology and medical technology in particular, it is clear that without the reasonable restraints imposed by philosophical but also, legal critique, medicine and its practitioners may unintentionally convert science and medical method into a muddled philosophy of human life'. Against this background, this paper will handle the questions posed by the extent and protection of human rights and freedoms in terms of application of new biomedical techniques and technologies of treatment toward the development of International human rights law. It also discusses the compatibility of domestic medical law with the normative system of international human rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"33 1","pages":"40-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Law and medicine are separate professions, and attorneys and physicians often see their professions in conflict. There are, however, more similarities than differences between the two professions. And there are areas of mutual concern and overlap that demand the application of both legal and medical knowledge for the good of the society. In the new categorical system of values, which is substantially influenced by the so-called modern or aggressive medicine, clever physicians, researchers, and technicians discover newer and better ways to do things. Often, what science and technology make possible soon becomes permissible and, eventually, normal and expected. Given the rapid advances in technology and medical technology in particular, it is clear that without the reasonable restraints imposed by philosophical but also, legal critique, medicine and its practitioners may unintentionally convert science and medical method into a muddled philosophy of human life'. Against this background, this paper will handle the questions posed by the extent and protection of human rights and freedoms in terms of application of new biomedical techniques and technologies of treatment toward the development of International human rights law. It also discusses the compatibility of domestic medical law with the normative system of international human rights.

医学、法律和人权——一种共生关系。
法律和医学是独立的职业,律师和医生经常看到他们的职业冲突。然而,这两种职业之间的相似之处多于不同点。还有一些共同关心和重叠的领域需要为了社会的利益而应用法律和医学知识。在这种新的价值分类体系中,聪明的医生、研究人员和技术人员发现了更新、更好的做事方法,这种价值分类体系在很大程度上受到所谓的现代医学或进取医学的影响。通常,科学技术使之成为可能的事情很快就会被允许,并最终成为常态和期望。鉴于技术,特别是医疗技术的迅速发展,很明显,如果没有哲学批判和法律批判所施加的合理限制,医学及其从业人员可能会无意中将科学和医疗方法转变为一种混乱的人类生活哲学。在此背景下,本文将从应用新的生物医学技术和治疗技术促进国际人权法发展的角度,处理人权和自由的程度和保护所提出的问题。它还讨论了国内医疗法与国际人权规范体系的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信