Pancreatic Remnant Occlusion after Whipple's Procedure: An Alternative Oncologically Safe Method.

ISRN surgery Pub Date : 2013-08-05 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/960424
Theodosios Theodosopoulos, Dionysios Dellaportas, Anneza I Yiallourou, George Gkiokas, George Polymeneas, Alexios Fotopoulos
{"title":"Pancreatic Remnant Occlusion after Whipple's Procedure: An Alternative Oncologically Safe Method.","authors":"Theodosios Theodosopoulos,&nbsp;Dionysios Dellaportas,&nbsp;Anneza I Yiallourou,&nbsp;George Gkiokas,&nbsp;George Polymeneas,&nbsp;Alexios Fotopoulos","doi":"10.1155/2013/960424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. To present our experience regarding the use of pancreatic stump occlusion technique as an alternative management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Methods. Between 2002 and 2009, hospital records of 93 patients who had undergone a Whipple's procedure for either pancreatic-periampullary cancer or chronic pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. In 37 patients the pancreatic duct was occluded by stapling and running suture without anastomosis of the pancreatic remnant, whereas in 56 patients a pancreaticojejunostomy was performed. Operative data, postoperative complications, oncological parameters, and survival rates were recorded. Results. 2/37 patients of the occlusion group and 9/56 patients of the anastomosis group were treated for chronic pancreatitis, whereas 35/37 and 47/56 patients for periampullary malignancies. The duration of surgery for the anastomosis group was significantly longer (mean time 220 versus 180 minutes). Mean hospitalization time was 6 days for both groups. The occlusion group had a lower morbidity rate (24% versus 32%). With regard to postoperative complications, a slightly higher incidence of pancreatic fistulas was observed in the anastomosis group. Conclusions. Pancreatic remnant occlusion is a safe, technically feasible, and reducing postoperative complications alternative approach of the pancreatic stump during Whipple's procedure. </p>","PeriodicalId":89400,"journal":{"name":"ISRN surgery","volume":"2013 ","pages":"960424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/960424","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/960424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Introduction. To present our experience regarding the use of pancreatic stump occlusion technique as an alternative management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Methods. Between 2002 and 2009, hospital records of 93 patients who had undergone a Whipple's procedure for either pancreatic-periampullary cancer or chronic pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. In 37 patients the pancreatic duct was occluded by stapling and running suture without anastomosis of the pancreatic remnant, whereas in 56 patients a pancreaticojejunostomy was performed. Operative data, postoperative complications, oncological parameters, and survival rates were recorded. Results. 2/37 patients of the occlusion group and 9/56 patients of the anastomosis group were treated for chronic pancreatitis, whereas 35/37 and 47/56 patients for periampullary malignancies. The duration of surgery for the anastomosis group was significantly longer (mean time 220 versus 180 minutes). Mean hospitalization time was 6 days for both groups. The occlusion group had a lower morbidity rate (24% versus 32%). With regard to postoperative complications, a slightly higher incidence of pancreatic fistulas was observed in the anastomosis group. Conclusions. Pancreatic remnant occlusion is a safe, technically feasible, and reducing postoperative complications alternative approach of the pancreatic stump during Whipple's procedure.

惠普尔手术后胰腺残端闭塞:一种肿瘤学上安全的替代方法。
介绍。介绍我们在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后使用胰残端闭塞技术作为胰残的另一种治疗方法的经验。方法。在2002年至2009年期间,回顾性研究了93例因胰腺壶腹周围癌或慢性胰腺炎而接受惠普尔手术的患者的医院记录。37例采用胰管吻合术阻断胰管,56例采用胰空肠吻合术。记录手术资料、术后并发症、肿瘤参数及生存率。结果:闭塞组2/37、吻合组9/56治疗慢性胰腺炎,壶腹周围恶性肿瘤35/37、47/56。吻合组的手术时间明显更长(平均时间220分钟比180分钟)。两组平均住院时间均为6 d。闭塞组发病率较低(24%对32%)。术后并发症方面,吻合组胰瘘发生率略高。结论。胰残端闭塞是Whipple手术中一种安全、技术可行、术后并发症少的胰残端替代入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信