Exploration of the role of radiotherapy in the management of early glottic cancer with complete carotid artery occlusion.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
Onkologie Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-07-08 DOI:10.1159/000353750
Waleed F Mourad, Kenneth S Hu, Rania A Shourbaji, James Dolan, Dukagjin M Blakaj, Daniel Shasha, Louis B Harrison
{"title":"Exploration of the role of radiotherapy in the management of early glottic cancer with complete carotid artery occlusion.","authors":"Waleed F Mourad,&nbsp;Kenneth S Hu,&nbsp;Rania A Shourbaji,&nbsp;James Dolan,&nbsp;Dukagjin M Blakaj,&nbsp;Daniel Shasha,&nbsp;Louis B Harrison","doi":"10.1159/000353750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 2D and 3D radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma in an effort to highlight the advantages of IMRT in this particular clinical situation.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>We present the case of an 82-year-old female patient with T1 left true vocal cord squamous cell carcinoma and complete occlusion of the left carotid artery resulting in multiple strokes. The patient underwent definitive RT with 63 Gy (28 × 2.25 Gy). 3 plans were generated: 2D RT, 3D RT, and IMRT. The right carotid artery (Rt.CA) mean dose was 865, 2,065, and 4,268 cGy for IMRT, 3D RT, and 2D RT, respectively. The inferior pharyngeal constrictor (IPC) mean dose was 5,341, 6,456, and 6,451 cGy for IMRT, 3D RT, and 2D RT, respectively. IMRT provided the best homogeneity but at a higher cost and with prolonged treatment time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMRT provided the finest planning target volume coverage with minimal Rt.CA and IPC doses. IMRT is recommended in certain clinical scenarios which are not manageable with other techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 7-8","pages":"433-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000353750","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000353750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 2D and 3D radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma in an effort to highlight the advantages of IMRT in this particular clinical situation.

Case report: We present the case of an 82-year-old female patient with T1 left true vocal cord squamous cell carcinoma and complete occlusion of the left carotid artery resulting in multiple strokes. The patient underwent definitive RT with 63 Gy (28 × 2.25 Gy). 3 plans were generated: 2D RT, 3D RT, and IMRT. The right carotid artery (Rt.CA) mean dose was 865, 2,065, and 4,268 cGy for IMRT, 3D RT, and 2D RT, respectively. The inferior pharyngeal constrictor (IPC) mean dose was 5,341, 6,456, and 6,451 cGy for IMRT, 3D RT, and 2D RT, respectively. IMRT provided the best homogeneity but at a higher cost and with prolonged treatment time.

Conclusion: IMRT provided the finest planning target volume coverage with minimal Rt.CA and IPC doses. IMRT is recommended in certain clinical scenarios which are not manageable with other techniques.

探讨放疗在早期声门癌合并颈动脉完全闭塞的治疗中的作用。
背景:本研究的目的是比较调强放疗(IMRT)与2D和3D放疗(RT)治疗T1声门鳞状细胞癌的效果,以突出调强放疗在这种特殊临床情况下的优势。病例报告:我们报告一位82岁的女性患者,患有T1左侧真声带鳞状细胞癌,左侧颈动脉完全闭塞,导致多发性中风。患者行63 Gy (28 × 2.25 Gy)的最终放射治疗。生成3种方案:2D RT、3D RT、IMRT。右颈动脉(RT . ca) IMRT、3D RT和2D RT的平均剂量分别为865、2065和4268 cGy。IMRT、3D RT和2D RT的下咽收缩剂(IPC)平均剂量分别为5341、6456和6451 cGy。IMRT提供了最好的均匀性,但成本较高,治疗时间较长。结论:IMRT以最小的Rt.CA和IPC剂量提供了最佳的计划靶体积覆盖。在某些其他技术无法控制的临床情况下,推荐使用IMRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Onkologie
Onkologie 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信