Open-access colonoscopy on Ontario: associated factors and quality.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Shane Hadlock, Linda Rabeneck, Lawrence F Paszat, Rinku Sutradhar, Andrew S Wilton, Jill Tinmouth
{"title":"Open-access colonoscopy on Ontario: associated factors and quality.","authors":"Shane Hadlock,&nbsp;Linda Rabeneck,&nbsp;Lawrence F Paszat,&nbsp;Rinku Sutradhar,&nbsp;Andrew S Wilton,&nbsp;Jill Tinmouth","doi":"10.1155/2013/295412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open-access (OA) colonoscopy may increase efficiency and decrease wait times; however, because the patient is seen for the first time at the endoscopy appointment, previous processes, such as information about the procedure, preparation and appropriate triage, may be suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors associated with OA colonoscopy and to determine the relationship between OA colonoscopy and an important quality measure, incomplete colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based analysis of all adult outpatients undergoing a first-time colonoscopy between 1997 and 2007 in Ontario was performed. Colonoscopy was considered to be OA if there were no visits in the preceding five years with the physician performing the colonoscopy. Using logistic regression, patient, physician and institution factors associated with OA colonoscopy were identified. Using propensity score matching, the relationship between OA colonoscopy and incomplete colonoscopy in 2006 was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,079,259 colonoscopies were performed. Of these, 14% were OA in 1997 compared with 26% in 2007. Patients 50 to 69 years of age, those from higher-income neighbourhoods and those with less comorbidity were more likely to undergo OA colonoscopy. The odds of receiving OA colonoscopy were six times greater in a nonhospital clinic compared with a community hospital. Colonoscopy was more likely to be complete if the procedure was OA (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.4]; P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of OA colonoscopy have increased substantially since 1997. Institution type was most strongly associated with OA colonoscopy. Colonoscopy completeness, a recognized quality indicator, does not appear to be compromised by OA colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55285,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/295412","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/295412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: Open-access (OA) colonoscopy may increase efficiency and decrease wait times; however, because the patient is seen for the first time at the endoscopy appointment, previous processes, such as information about the procedure, preparation and appropriate triage, may be suboptimal.

Objective: To identify factors associated with OA colonoscopy and to determine the relationship between OA colonoscopy and an important quality measure, incomplete colonoscopy.

Methods: A population-based analysis of all adult outpatients undergoing a first-time colonoscopy between 1997 and 2007 in Ontario was performed. Colonoscopy was considered to be OA if there were no visits in the preceding five years with the physician performing the colonoscopy. Using logistic regression, patient, physician and institution factors associated with OA colonoscopy were identified. Using propensity score matching, the relationship between OA colonoscopy and incomplete colonoscopy in 2006 was examined.

Results: A total of 1,079,259 colonoscopies were performed. Of these, 14% were OA in 1997 compared with 26% in 2007. Patients 50 to 69 years of age, those from higher-income neighbourhoods and those with less comorbidity were more likely to undergo OA colonoscopy. The odds of receiving OA colonoscopy were six times greater in a nonhospital clinic compared with a community hospital. Colonoscopy was more likely to be complete if the procedure was OA (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.4]; P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Rates of OA colonoscopy have increased substantially since 1997. Institution type was most strongly associated with OA colonoscopy. Colonoscopy completeness, a recognized quality indicator, does not appear to be compromised by OA colonoscopy.

安大略省开放结肠镜检查:相关因素和质量。
背景:开放获取(OA)结肠镜检查可以提高效率并减少等待时间;然而,由于患者是在内窥镜检查预约时第一次就诊,以前的过程,如关于手术的信息、准备和适当的分诊,可能不是最佳的。目的:确定OA结肠镜检查的相关因素,并确定OA结肠镜检查与不完全结肠镜检查的重要质量指标之间的关系。方法:对安大略省1997年至2007年间首次接受结肠镜检查的所有成年门诊患者进行基于人群的分析。结肠镜检查被认为是OA,如果在过去的五年没有访问与医生进行结肠镜检查。使用逻辑回归,确定与OA结肠镜检查相关的患者、医生和机构因素。采用倾向评分匹配法,对2006年OA结肠镜检查与不完全结肠镜检查的关系进行分析。结果:共进行了1,079,259次结肠镜检查。其中,1997年为14%,2007年为26%。年龄在50 - 69岁之间、来自高收入社区和合并症较少的患者更有可能接受OA结肠镜检查。在非医院诊所接受OA结肠镜检查的几率是社区医院的六倍。如果手术是OA,结肠镜检查更有可能完成(OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.2至1.4];结论:自1997年以来OA结肠镜检查的比例显著增加。机构类型与OA结肠镜检查的相关性最强。结肠镜检查的完整性,一个公认的质量指标,似乎不会受到OA结肠镜检查的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信