The prostate-specific antigen test.

Expert opinion on medical diagnostics Pub Date : 2013-09-01 Epub Date: 2013-07-23 DOI:10.1517/17530059.2013.821980
Monique J Roobol
{"title":"The prostate-specific antigen test.","authors":"Monique J Roobol","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2013.821980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before the 1980s, prostate cancer (PC) was considered a deadly disease. The mortality-incidence ratio showed that 1 out of each 2 - 3 PC patients died of this disease. On the other hand, autopsy studies have shown that latent PC is common in middle-aged men. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a glycoprotein produced by the epithelial cells of the prostate gland, received FDA's approval in 1986 for monitoring treatment response, and in 1994 as a screening aid for the diagnosis of PC. After the publication of two randomized trials on PC screening using the PSA test, it is generally accepted that systematic PSA-based screening, as compared to a clinical situation with virtually no screening, can reduce suffering from metastatic disease and PC mortality. However, what is also shown is that PSA-based screening coincides with a considerable amount of unnecessary testing and overdiagnosis. Should we abandon the use of the PSA test for the diagnosis of PC, or should we encourage PSA testing and make it freely available for all men at any time? Both the answers should be \"No.\" What we must do is use the test as wisely as is currently possible and inform men, who want to be tested, in a balanced way about harms and potential benefits. </p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":"7 5","pages":"423-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2013.821980","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2013.821980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Before the 1980s, prostate cancer (PC) was considered a deadly disease. The mortality-incidence ratio showed that 1 out of each 2 - 3 PC patients died of this disease. On the other hand, autopsy studies have shown that latent PC is common in middle-aged men. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a glycoprotein produced by the epithelial cells of the prostate gland, received FDA's approval in 1986 for monitoring treatment response, and in 1994 as a screening aid for the diagnosis of PC. After the publication of two randomized trials on PC screening using the PSA test, it is generally accepted that systematic PSA-based screening, as compared to a clinical situation with virtually no screening, can reduce suffering from metastatic disease and PC mortality. However, what is also shown is that PSA-based screening coincides with a considerable amount of unnecessary testing and overdiagnosis. Should we abandon the use of the PSA test for the diagnosis of PC, or should we encourage PSA testing and make it freely available for all men at any time? Both the answers should be "No." What we must do is use the test as wisely as is currently possible and inform men, who want to be tested, in a balanced way about harms and potential benefits.

前列腺特异性抗原测试。
20世纪80年代以前,前列腺癌(PC)被认为是一种致命的疾病。病死率显示,每2 ~ 3例PC患者中有1例死于此病。另一方面,尸检研究表明潜伏性PC在中年男性中很常见。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)是一种由前列腺上皮细胞产生的糖蛋白,于1986年获得FDA批准用于监测治疗反应,并于1994年作为诊断前列腺癌的筛查辅助手段。在发表了两项使用PSA检测筛查前列腺癌的随机试验后,人们普遍认为,与几乎没有筛查的临床情况相比,系统的基于PSA的筛查可以减少转移性疾病的痛苦和前列腺癌的死亡率。然而,同样显示的是,基于psa的筛查同时伴随着大量不必要的检测和过度诊断。我们是应该放弃使用PSA检测来诊断PC,还是应该鼓励PSA检测,让所有男性在任何时候都可以免费使用?两个答案都应该是否定的。我们必须做的是尽可能明智地使用这项检测,并以平衡的方式告知想要接受检测的男性其危害和潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信