Corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics in adults using a further modified technique.

Eatemad A Shoreibah, Ahmed E Salama, Mai S Attia, Shahira M Al-Moutaseum Abu-Seida
{"title":"Corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics in adults using a further modified technique.","authors":"Eatemad A Shoreibah,&nbsp;Ahmed E Salama,&nbsp;Mai S Attia,&nbsp;Shahira M Al-Moutaseum Abu-Seida","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics (CFO) in adults using a further modified technique versus traditional therapy in orthodontic tooth movement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty adult orthodontic patients with moderate crowding of the lower anterior teeth were randomly divided and treated with either a modified technique of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement (Group I) or conventional orthodontic therapy (Group II). Total treatment time was calculated in weeks from the time of activation of the orthodontic appliance immediately following the corticotomy procedure to the time of debracketing. Clinical periodontal parameters and standardized periapical radiographs were recorded at baseline, post-orthodontic treatment (time of debracketing) and six months post-operatively. The primary radiographic variables were root length and bone density.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment duration for patients in both groups ranged from 14-20 weeks. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the treatment duration: 17.5 +/- 2.8 weeks in the CFO group and 49 +/- 12.3 weeks in the conventional orthodontic therapy group. No significant changes occurred in clinical probing depth in either group at any time interval. The net percentage of change that occurred in bone density from baseline to six months post-treatment was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Group I demonstrated a net decrease in bone density of 21.8%, while Group II demonstrated a net decrease of 37.2%. Group I demonstrated an average net decrease in root length of 0.02 +/- 0.10 mm, while Group II demonstrated an average net decrease of 1.4 +/- 0.8 mm, which was not statistically significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the current study suggest that corticotomy-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement using a further modified technique significantly reduces the total time of treatment. In addition, the incidence of root resorption and adverse effect on teeth investing tissues associated with orthodontic tooth movement were reduced. Moreover, the acceleration of tooth movement through the proposed technique motivated patient cooperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics (CFO) in adults using a further modified technique versus traditional therapy in orthodontic tooth movement.

Methods: Twenty adult orthodontic patients with moderate crowding of the lower anterior teeth were randomly divided and treated with either a modified technique of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement (Group I) or conventional orthodontic therapy (Group II). Total treatment time was calculated in weeks from the time of activation of the orthodontic appliance immediately following the corticotomy procedure to the time of debracketing. Clinical periodontal parameters and standardized periapical radiographs were recorded at baseline, post-orthodontic treatment (time of debracketing) and six months post-operatively. The primary radiographic variables were root length and bone density.

Results: Treatment duration for patients in both groups ranged from 14-20 weeks. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the treatment duration: 17.5 +/- 2.8 weeks in the CFO group and 49 +/- 12.3 weeks in the conventional orthodontic therapy group. No significant changes occurred in clinical probing depth in either group at any time interval. The net percentage of change that occurred in bone density from baseline to six months post-treatment was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Group I demonstrated a net decrease in bone density of 21.8%, while Group II demonstrated a net decrease of 37.2%. Group I demonstrated an average net decrease in root length of 0.02 +/- 0.10 mm, while Group II demonstrated an average net decrease of 1.4 +/- 0.8 mm, which was not statistically significantly different.

Conclusion: The results of the current study suggest that corticotomy-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement using a further modified technique significantly reduces the total time of treatment. In addition, the incidence of root resorption and adverse effect on teeth investing tissues associated with orthodontic tooth movement were reduced. Moreover, the acceleration of tooth movement through the proposed technique motivated patient cooperation.

皮质切开术促进正畸成人使用进一步改进的技术。
目的:评价皮质切开术促进正畸(CFO)成人使用进一步改进技术与传统治疗正畸牙齿移动的效果。方法:选取20例下前牙中度拥挤的成人正畸患者,随机分组,采用改良的皮质切开术促进正畸牙齿移动技术(I组)或常规正畸治疗(II组)进行治疗。从皮质切开术后立即激活正畸矫治器到脱托时间,以周为单位计算总治疗时间。临床牙周参数和标准化根尖周x线片分别记录于基线、正畸治疗后(去托牙时间)和术后6个月。主要影像学变量为根长和骨密度。结果:两组患者治疗时间14 ~ 20周。两组治疗时间差异有统计学意义:CFO组17.5 +/- 2.8周,常规正畸治疗组49 +/- 12.3周。两组临床探诊深度在任何时间间隔均无明显变化。从基线到治疗后6个月骨密度变化的净百分比在两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。组1骨密度净下降21.8%,组2骨密度净下降37.2%。1组根长平均净减少0.02 +/- 0.10 mm, 2组根长平均净减少1.4 +/- 0.8 mm,差异无统计学意义。结论:目前的研究结果表明,皮质切开术促进正畸牙齿移动使用进一步改进的技术显著减少治疗的总时间。此外,减少了正畸牙齿移动过程中牙根吸收的发生率和对牙投资组织的不良影响。此外,通过所提出的技术,牙齿运动的加速促进了患者的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信