From perception to functional outcome in schizophrenia: modeling the role of ability and motivation.

Michael F Green, Gerhard Hellemann, William P Horan, Junghee Lee, Jonathan K Wynn
{"title":"From perception to functional outcome in schizophrenia: modeling the role of ability and motivation.","authors":"Michael F Green,&nbsp;Gerhard Hellemann,&nbsp;William P Horan,&nbsp;Junghee Lee,&nbsp;Jonathan K Wynn","doi":"10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CONTEXT Schizophrenia remains a highly disabling disorder, but the specific determinants and pathways that lead to functional impairment are not well understood. It is not known whether these key determinants of outcome lie on 1 or multiple pathways. OBJECTIVE To evaluate theoretically based models of pathways to functional outcome starting with early visual perception. The intervening variables were previously established determinants of outcome drawn from 2 general categories: ability (ie, social cognition and functional capacity) and beliefs/motivation (ie, defeatist beliefs, expressive and experiential negative symptoms). We evaluated an integrative model in which these intervening variables formed a single pathway to poor outcome. DESIGN This was a cross-sectional study that applied structural equation modeling to evaluate the relationships among determinants of functional outcome in schizophrenia. SETTING Assessments were conducted at a Veterans Administration Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS One hundred ninety-one clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited from the community. RESULTS A measurement model showed that the latent variables of perception, social cognition, and functional outcome were well reflected by their indicators. An initial untrimmed structural model with functional capacity, defeatist beliefs, and expressive and experiential negative symptoms had good model fit. A final trimmed model was a single path running from perception to ability to motivational variables to outcome. It was more parsimonious and had better fit indices than the untrimmed model. Further, it could not be improved by adding or dropping connections that would change the single path to multiple paths. The indirect effect from perception to outcome was significant. CONCLUSIONS The final structural model was a single pathway running from perception to ability to beliefs/motivation to outcome. Hence, both ability and motivation appear to be needed for community functioning and can be modeled effectively on the same pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":8286,"journal":{"name":"Archives of general psychiatry","volume":"69 12","pages":"1216-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.652","citationCount":"336","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of general psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 336

Abstract

CONTEXT Schizophrenia remains a highly disabling disorder, but the specific determinants and pathways that lead to functional impairment are not well understood. It is not known whether these key determinants of outcome lie on 1 or multiple pathways. OBJECTIVE To evaluate theoretically based models of pathways to functional outcome starting with early visual perception. The intervening variables were previously established determinants of outcome drawn from 2 general categories: ability (ie, social cognition and functional capacity) and beliefs/motivation (ie, defeatist beliefs, expressive and experiential negative symptoms). We evaluated an integrative model in which these intervening variables formed a single pathway to poor outcome. DESIGN This was a cross-sectional study that applied structural equation modeling to evaluate the relationships among determinants of functional outcome in schizophrenia. SETTING Assessments were conducted at a Veterans Administration Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS One hundred ninety-one clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited from the community. RESULTS A measurement model showed that the latent variables of perception, social cognition, and functional outcome were well reflected by their indicators. An initial untrimmed structural model with functional capacity, defeatist beliefs, and expressive and experiential negative symptoms had good model fit. A final trimmed model was a single path running from perception to ability to motivational variables to outcome. It was more parsimonious and had better fit indices than the untrimmed model. Further, it could not be improved by adding or dropping connections that would change the single path to multiple paths. The indirect effect from perception to outcome was significant. CONCLUSIONS The final structural model was a single pathway running from perception to ability to beliefs/motivation to outcome. Hence, both ability and motivation appear to be needed for community functioning and can be modeled effectively on the same pathway.

从知觉到精神分裂症的功能结果:能力和动机的角色建模。
精神分裂症仍然是一种高度致残的疾病,但导致功能损害的具体决定因素和途径尚不清楚。目前尚不清楚这些决定结果的关键因素是否存在于一条或多条途径上。目的评价从早期视觉感知开始的功能结局通路的理论基础模型。干预变量是先前从两大类中确定的结果决定因素:能力(即社会认知和功能能力)和信念/动机(即失败主义信念、表达性和经验性阴性症状)。我们评估了一个综合模型,其中这些干预变量形成了导致不良结果的单一途径。设计:这是一项横断面研究,应用结构方程模型来评估精神分裂症功能结局决定因素之间的关系。评估是在退伍军人管理局医疗中心进行的。参与者从社区招募了191名临床稳定的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍门诊患者。结果测量模型显示,知觉潜变量、社会认知潜变量和功能结局潜变量均能很好地反映其指标。具有功能能力、失败主义信念、表达性和经验性阴性症状的初始未修剪结构模型具有良好的模型拟合性。最后修剪的模型是一条从感知到能力到动机变量到结果的单一路径。它比未经修整的模型更简洁,具有更好的拟合指数。此外,它不能通过添加或删除将单个路径更改为多个路径的连接来改进。从知觉到结果的间接影响是显著的。结论:最终的结构模型是一条从感知到能力、信念/动机到结果的单一通路。因此,能力和动机似乎都是社区运作所必需的,并且可以在同一途径上有效地建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of general psychiatry
Archives of general psychiatry 医学-精神病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信