Comparative assessments of VOC emission rates and associated health risks from wastewater treatment processes.

Journal of Environmental Monitoring Pub Date : 2012-09-01 Epub Date: 2012-07-30 DOI:10.1039/c2em30138e
Wen-Ben Yang, Wei-Hsiang Chen, Chung-Shin Yuan, Jun-Chen Yang, Qing-Liang Zhao
{"title":"Comparative assessments of VOC emission rates and associated health risks from wastewater treatment processes.","authors":"Wen-Ben Yang,&nbsp;Wei-Hsiang Chen,&nbsp;Chung-Shin Yuan,&nbsp;Jun-Chen Yang,&nbsp;Qing-Liang Zhao","doi":"10.1039/c2em30138e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the growing concern regarding emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), the relationship between the VOC emission rates and the associated public health risks has been rarely discussed. The objective of this study was to examine and compare the VOC emission rates and cancer and non-cancer risks by inhalation intake, using a municipal WWTP in China as an example, with respect to the effects of treatment technologies, VOC species, and seasonal variation. Given the treatment technology considered, the emission rates of VOCs in this study were estimated by means of mass balance or calculated on the molecular level. From the viewpoints of both emission rates and cancer and non-cancer risks, sedimentation was the treatment technology with the highest health risks to the workers. Slightly lower VOC emission rates and health risks than those for sedimentation were observed in anaerobic treatment. Although the aeration significantly enhanced the VOC emission rates in the aerobic treatment process, the associated health risks were limited due to the low VOC concentrations in the gas phase, which were likely attributed to the strong mixing and dilution with fresh air by aeration. Amongst the VOCs investigated, benzene was the VOC with both a relatively high emission rate and health risk, while trichloroethylene possessed a high emission rate but the lowest health risk. Without strong interfacial aeration and turbulence between the water and atmosphere, the effects of treatment technology and seasonal variation on the health risks might be connected to the VOC emission rates, while the effect of VOC species depended considerably on the respective cancer slope factors and reference concentrations; the employment of aeration provided a different conclusion in which the emission rates were enhanced without a significant increase in the related cancer risks. These findings can provide insight into future health risk management and reduction strategies for workers in WWTPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/c2em30138e","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30138e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

With the growing concern regarding emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), the relationship between the VOC emission rates and the associated public health risks has been rarely discussed. The objective of this study was to examine and compare the VOC emission rates and cancer and non-cancer risks by inhalation intake, using a municipal WWTP in China as an example, with respect to the effects of treatment technologies, VOC species, and seasonal variation. Given the treatment technology considered, the emission rates of VOCs in this study were estimated by means of mass balance or calculated on the molecular level. From the viewpoints of both emission rates and cancer and non-cancer risks, sedimentation was the treatment technology with the highest health risks to the workers. Slightly lower VOC emission rates and health risks than those for sedimentation were observed in anaerobic treatment. Although the aeration significantly enhanced the VOC emission rates in the aerobic treatment process, the associated health risks were limited due to the low VOC concentrations in the gas phase, which were likely attributed to the strong mixing and dilution with fresh air by aeration. Amongst the VOCs investigated, benzene was the VOC with both a relatively high emission rate and health risk, while trichloroethylene possessed a high emission rate but the lowest health risk. Without strong interfacial aeration and turbulence between the water and atmosphere, the effects of treatment technology and seasonal variation on the health risks might be connected to the VOC emission rates, while the effect of VOC species depended considerably on the respective cancer slope factors and reference concentrations; the employment of aeration provided a different conclusion in which the emission rates were enhanced without a significant increase in the related cancer risks. These findings can provide insight into future health risk management and reduction strategies for workers in WWTPs.

对废水处理过程中挥发性有机化合物排放率和相关健康风险的比较评估。
随着人们对污水处理厂挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)排放的日益关注,VOC排放率与相关公共健康风险之间的关系很少被讨论。本研究的目的是以中国某城市污水处理厂为例,就处理技术、VOC种类和季节变化的影响,研究和比较吸入VOC排放率、癌症和非癌症风险。考虑到所考虑的处理技术,本研究中VOCs的排放率采用质量平衡法估算或在分子水平上进行计算。从排放率、致癌风险和非致癌风险的角度来看,沉淀法是对工人健康风险最高的处理技术。在厌氧处理中观察到的VOC排放率和健康风险略低于沉淀法。虽然曝气显著提高了好氧处理过程中VOC的排放率,但由于气相中VOC浓度较低,相关的健康风险有限,这可能是由于曝气与新鲜空气的强烈混合和稀释。在所调查的挥发性有机化合物中,苯的排放率和健康风险均较高,而三氯乙烯的排放率较高,但健康风险最低。在水-大气界面无强通气和湍流的情况下,处理工艺和季节变化对健康风险的影响可能与VOC排放速率有关,而VOC种类的影响主要取决于各自的癌坡因子和参考浓度;曝气的使用提供了一个不同的结论,在没有显著增加相关癌症风险的情况下,排放率得到了提高。这些发现可以为未来污水处理厂工人的健康风险管理和减少策略提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Monitoring
Journal of Environmental Monitoring 环境科学-分析化学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信