Histopathologic review of previously negative prostatic core needle biopsies following a new diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate by core needle biopsies: implications for quality assurance programs.

Clinical medicine. Pathology Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-09-16 DOI:10.4137/cpath.s581
Jay Patel, Lester J Layfield
{"title":"Histopathologic review of previously negative prostatic core needle biopsies following a new diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate by core needle biopsies: implications for quality assurance programs.","authors":"Jay Patel,&nbsp;Lester J Layfield","doi":"10.4137/cpath.s581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Programs for quality assurance are increasingly important in surgical pathology. Many quality assurance (QA) techniques for surgical pathology were adopted from procedures introduced in cytopathology. Surgical pathology specimens have diminished in size such that the majority of diagnostic biopsies of prostatic lesions are now core needle biopsies. These specimens raise issues similar to those of cytology specimens, including concerns regarding adequacy and the representative nature of the biopsy. Due to sample size, some neoplasms may not be diagnosed on initial biopsy, raising concerns regarding false negative results. Cytopathologists have instituted QA procedures including review of all previously negative slides received within five years prior to the new diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or gynecologic malignancy. No such requirement exists in surgical pathology for review of core biopsies.The Department of Pathology at the University of Utah instituted a QA policy requiring review of prior negative prostatic needle biopsies following a new diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. We reviewed five years of QA records of prostate needle biopsy review. During this time, nine hundred and fifty-eight core biopsy sets were performed. Two hundred and ninety-five of these contained at least one biopsy with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Two hundred and eight patients had a prior set of prostatic needle biopsies with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The remaining 87 had prior biopsies with either a diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (23), small atypical acinar proliferation (21) or no evidence of malignancy (43). QA review of these 87 cases revealed two biopsies which revealed foci of adenocarcinoma. Both had been initially diagnosed as no evidence of malignancy. The false negative rate for core biopsy was 0.68%. In an additional twenty-one cases, microscopic foci of atypical small acinar proliferations were found in core biopsies antedating the positive core biopsy (7.1%).</p>","PeriodicalId":89118,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Pathology","volume":"1 ","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159997/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/cpath.s581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Programs for quality assurance are increasingly important in surgical pathology. Many quality assurance (QA) techniques for surgical pathology were adopted from procedures introduced in cytopathology. Surgical pathology specimens have diminished in size such that the majority of diagnostic biopsies of prostatic lesions are now core needle biopsies. These specimens raise issues similar to those of cytology specimens, including concerns regarding adequacy and the representative nature of the biopsy. Due to sample size, some neoplasms may not be diagnosed on initial biopsy, raising concerns regarding false negative results. Cytopathologists have instituted QA procedures including review of all previously negative slides received within five years prior to the new diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or gynecologic malignancy. No such requirement exists in surgical pathology for review of core biopsies.The Department of Pathology at the University of Utah instituted a QA policy requiring review of prior negative prostatic needle biopsies following a new diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. We reviewed five years of QA records of prostate needle biopsy review. During this time, nine hundred and fifty-eight core biopsy sets were performed. Two hundred and ninety-five of these contained at least one biopsy with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Two hundred and eight patients had a prior set of prostatic needle biopsies with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The remaining 87 had prior biopsies with either a diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (23), small atypical acinar proliferation (21) or no evidence of malignancy (43). QA review of these 87 cases revealed two biopsies which revealed foci of adenocarcinoma. Both had been initially diagnosed as no evidence of malignancy. The false negative rate for core biopsy was 0.68%. In an additional twenty-one cases, microscopic foci of atypical small acinar proliferations were found in core biopsies antedating the positive core biopsy (7.1%).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

先前阴性的前列腺核心针活检后的新诊断前列腺腺癌核心针活检的组织病理学回顾:对质量保证计划的影响。
质量保证程序在外科病理学中越来越重要。许多质量保证(QA)技术的外科病理采用的程序介绍了细胞病理学。手术病理标本的大小已经缩小,因此大多数前列腺病变的诊断活检现在是核心针活检。这些标本提出了与细胞学标本类似的问题,包括对活检的充分性和代表性的关注。由于样本量的原因,一些肿瘤可能无法在最初的活检中被诊断出来,这引起了对假阴性结果的担忧。细胞病理学家已经建立了QA程序,包括在新诊断为高度鳞状上皮内病变或妇科恶性肿瘤之前五年内收到的所有阴性玻片的审查。在外科病理学中对核心活检的复查没有这样的要求。犹他大学病理学系制定了一项QA政策,要求在新的前列腺腺癌诊断后对既往阴性的前列腺穿刺活检进行复查。我们回顾了5年来前列腺穿刺活检的QA记录。在此期间,共进行了958组芯活检。其中295例至少有一次活检诊断为腺癌。288例患者先前有一组前列腺穿刺活检,诊断为腺癌。其余87例既往活检诊断为前列腺上皮内瘤变(23例),小的非典型腺泡增生(21例)或无恶性肿瘤证据(43例)。对这87例病例的QA复查显示两次活检均发现腺癌灶。两人最初都被诊断为没有恶性肿瘤的迹象。核心活检假阴性率为0.68%。在另外21例病例中,在核心活检阳性之前,显微镜下发现非典型小腺泡增生灶(7.1%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信