A population based economic analysis of cross-border payments for fertility services in Luxembourg.

Christopher A Jones, Louis G Keith, Valery Bocquet, Jacques Arendt, Jean Smit, Guy Berchem, Marie-Lise Lair
{"title":"A population based economic analysis of cross-border payments for fertility services in Luxembourg.","authors":"Christopher A Jones,&nbsp;Louis G Keith,&nbsp;Valery Bocquet,&nbsp;Jacques Arendt,&nbsp;Jean Smit,&nbsp;Guy Berchem,&nbsp;Marie-Lise Lair","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>How fertility patients utilise assisted reproductive services can depend on how easy it is to access such services locally. Little data exist to document the extent of economic outflow that accompanies cross-border patient travel specifically for medical procedures that cannot be obtained in country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this investigation, data from Luxembourg's social security agency were used to audit medical reimbursement payments for IVF within and outside the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg between 1998 and 2007. This study interval offered an opportunity to track IVF expenditures before and after IVF was made freely available within the Grand Duchy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reimbursement authorizations to IVF providers outside Luxembourg remained stable or slightly elevated until 2005, two years after Luxembourg opened its first IVF centre. Once established in Luxembourg, annual utilisation of the domestic IVF service generally trended upwards (217 cycles in 2003 vs. 569 in 2008). Meanwhile, payments to foreign IVF clinics declined steadily after 2005 reflecting a diminishing number of Luxembourg patients seeking cross-border IVF treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data represent the most comprehensive register of cross-border reproductive visits in Europe. Since Luxembourg fully reimburses its citizens for health-related expenses irrespective of where the medical service is obtained, the current investigation renders the \"out of pocket\" effect of IVF fees irrelevant and characterise consumption of elective medical treatments as a function of service site. Further studies are needed to determine if these findings will generalise to other geographic regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":87102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental & clinical assisted reproduction","volume":"7 ","pages":"pii: 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2951751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental & clinical assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: How fertility patients utilise assisted reproductive services can depend on how easy it is to access such services locally. Little data exist to document the extent of economic outflow that accompanies cross-border patient travel specifically for medical procedures that cannot be obtained in country.

Methods: In this investigation, data from Luxembourg's social security agency were used to audit medical reimbursement payments for IVF within and outside the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg between 1998 and 2007. This study interval offered an opportunity to track IVF expenditures before and after IVF was made freely available within the Grand Duchy.

Results: Reimbursement authorizations to IVF providers outside Luxembourg remained stable or slightly elevated until 2005, two years after Luxembourg opened its first IVF centre. Once established in Luxembourg, annual utilisation of the domestic IVF service generally trended upwards (217 cycles in 2003 vs. 569 in 2008). Meanwhile, payments to foreign IVF clinics declined steadily after 2005 reflecting a diminishing number of Luxembourg patients seeking cross-border IVF treatment.

Conclusion: These data represent the most comprehensive register of cross-border reproductive visits in Europe. Since Luxembourg fully reimburses its citizens for health-related expenses irrespective of where the medical service is obtained, the current investigation renders the "out of pocket" effect of IVF fees irrelevant and characterise consumption of elective medical treatments as a function of service site. Further studies are needed to determine if these findings will generalise to other geographic regions.

基于人口的卢森堡生育服务跨境支付经济分析。
目的:生育患者如何利用辅助生殖服务可能取决于在当地获得此类服务的难易程度。很少有数据记录由于患者跨境旅行特别是在国内无法获得的医疗程序而造成的经济外流的程度。方法:在这项调查中,来自卢森堡社会保障机构的数据被用于审计1998年至2007年在卢森堡大公国境内外的试管婴儿医疗报销支付。这个研究间隔提供了一个机会来跟踪试管婴儿在大公国免费提供之前和之后的试管婴儿支出。结果:卢森堡以外的试管婴儿提供者的报销授权保持稳定或略有上升,直到2005年,两年后卢森堡开设了第一个试管婴儿中心。一旦在卢森堡建立,国内试管婴儿服务的年使用率普遍呈上升趋势(2003年为217周期,2008年为569周期)。与此同时,2005年后,支付给外国试管婴儿诊所的费用稳步下降,反映出寻求跨境试管婴儿治疗的卢森堡患者数量减少。结论:这些数据代表了欧洲最全面的跨境生殖访问记录。由于卢森堡无论在何处获得医疗服务,都全额偿还其公民的健康相关费用,因此目前的调查表明,试管婴儿费用的"自掏腰包"影响无关紧要,并将选择性医疗的消费特征视为服务地点的功能。需要进一步的研究来确定这些发现是否可以推广到其他地理区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信