Large-volume breast reduction: Long-term results.

Sagit Meshulam-Derazon, Yoav Barnea, Arik Zaretski, David Leshem, Udi Miller, Beni Meilik, Jerry Weiss, Rafael Shafir, Aharon Amir, Eyal Gur
{"title":"Large-volume breast reduction: Long-term results.","authors":"Sagit Meshulam-Derazon,&nbsp;Yoav Barnea,&nbsp;Arik Zaretski,&nbsp;David Leshem,&nbsp;Udi Miller,&nbsp;Beni Meilik,&nbsp;Jerry Weiss,&nbsp;Rafael Shafir,&nbsp;Aharon Amir,&nbsp;Eyal Gur","doi":"10.1080/02844310802594068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forty-three women had reduction mammaplasty during the period 1992-2000 and the cosmetic outcome was evaluated using subjective and objective measures. The inferior pedicle technique was used in all cases. The mean (SD) weight of resected tissue was 1121 (415) g. All objective measurements were within the ideal range except for breast volume and nipple-to-inframammary-line distance, which were more than ideal. Overall, the median difference in measurements between the two breasts of each woman was less than 10%. However, the subjective evaluations given by both clinicians and the patients for overall symmetry and for general aesthetic appearance fell below the preset threshold. The shape of the breast correlated best with the grades of symmetry and general appearance. There was no correlation between the objective and subjective evaluations of symmetry. The disappointing subjective scores, which may be attributed to the specific characteristics of our sample group, are heavy breasts and overweight patients, a double team approach, and the inevitable pseudoptosis that develops with the inferior pedicle approach. These direct us to recommend searching for an alternative operative technique and to evaluate its long term results, as well as placing the nipple-areola complex lower than the standard inframammary fold projection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49569,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"43 2","pages":"65-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02844310802594068","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310802594068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Forty-three women had reduction mammaplasty during the period 1992-2000 and the cosmetic outcome was evaluated using subjective and objective measures. The inferior pedicle technique was used in all cases. The mean (SD) weight of resected tissue was 1121 (415) g. All objective measurements were within the ideal range except for breast volume and nipple-to-inframammary-line distance, which were more than ideal. Overall, the median difference in measurements between the two breasts of each woman was less than 10%. However, the subjective evaluations given by both clinicians and the patients for overall symmetry and for general aesthetic appearance fell below the preset threshold. The shape of the breast correlated best with the grades of symmetry and general appearance. There was no correlation between the objective and subjective evaluations of symmetry. The disappointing subjective scores, which may be attributed to the specific characteristics of our sample group, are heavy breasts and overweight patients, a double team approach, and the inevitable pseudoptosis that develops with the inferior pedicle approach. These direct us to recommend searching for an alternative operative technique and to evaluate its long term results, as well as placing the nipple-areola complex lower than the standard inframammary fold projection.

大体积缩乳:长期效果。
在1992-2000年期间,43名妇女接受了乳房缩小术,并采用主观和客观的方法对其美容效果进行了评估。所有病例均采用下椎弓根技术。切除组织的平均(SD)重量为1121 (415)g。除乳房体积和乳头到乳房下线距离超出理想范围外,所有客观测量值均在理想范围内。总体而言,每位女性的两个乳房测量值的中位数差异小于10%。然而,临床医生和患者对整体对称性和总体美学外观的主观评价低于预设阈值。乳房的形状与身体的对称程度和整体外貌的关系最为密切。对对称性的客观评价和主观评价之间没有相关性。令人失望的主观评分可能归因于我们样本组的特定特征,包括乳房过重和超重患者,双组入路,以及不可避免的下椎弓根入路假眼。这些提示我们建议寻找一种替代的手术技术,并评估其长期效果,以及将乳头-乳晕复合体放置在低于标准乳下褶投影的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信