Confronting the 'evidence' in evidence-based HIV prevention: current scientific and political challenges.

Judith D Auerbach, William Smith
{"title":"Confronting the 'evidence' in evidence-based HIV prevention: current scientific and political challenges.","authors":"Judith D Auerbach,&nbsp;William Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent years have witnessed the increasing adoption of an evidence-based public health approach in HIV prevention science, yet this approach is limited by lack of consensus about what counts as \"evidence.\" In 2007, the San Francisco AIDS Foundation (SFAF) launched an initiative to engage HIV/AIDS organizations, researchers, program implementers, policy makers, and funders in a robust discussion of what really constitutes \"evidence\" in evidence-based HIV prevention. The core of this initiative is a series of panel discussions about the gathering and interpreting of evidence for establishing efficacy and effectiveness in HIV prevention--evidence that is then used to inform decisions about which interventions to implement, fund, and scale up.</p>","PeriodicalId":80644,"journal":{"name":"BETA : bulletin of experimental treatments for AIDS : a publication of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation","volume":"20 4","pages":"44-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BETA : bulletin of experimental treatments for AIDS : a publication of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the increasing adoption of an evidence-based public health approach in HIV prevention science, yet this approach is limited by lack of consensus about what counts as "evidence." In 2007, the San Francisco AIDS Foundation (SFAF) launched an initiative to engage HIV/AIDS organizations, researchers, program implementers, policy makers, and funders in a robust discussion of what really constitutes "evidence" in evidence-based HIV prevention. The core of this initiative is a series of panel discussions about the gathering and interpreting of evidence for establishing efficacy and effectiveness in HIV prevention--evidence that is then used to inform decisions about which interventions to implement, fund, and scale up.

面对基于证据的艾滋病毒预防中的“证据”:当前的科学和政治挑战。
近年来,艾滋病毒预防科学越来越多地采用循证公共卫生方法,但这种方法由于缺乏对“证据”的共识而受到限制。2007年,旧金山艾滋病基金会(SFAF)发起了一项倡议,让艾滋病组织、研究人员、项目执行者、政策制定者和资助者参与到以证据为基础的艾滋病预防中,就什么是真正的“证据”展开热烈讨论。该倡议的核心是一系列关于收集和解释证据以确定艾滋病毒预防的效力和有效性的小组讨论,然后利用这些证据来决定实施、资助和扩大哪些干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信