Health promotion competencies for Australia 2001-5: trends and their implications.

Trevor Shilton, Peter Howat, Ray James, Linda Burke, Cheryl Hutchins, Richard Woodman
{"title":"Health promotion competencies for Australia 2001-5: trends and their implications.","authors":"Trevor Shilton,&nbsp;Peter Howat,&nbsp;Ray James,&nbsp;Linda Burke,&nbsp;Cheryl Hutchins,&nbsp;Richard Woodman","doi":"10.1177/1025382308090341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This important research builds on past projects in Australia and internationally that have sought to define and clarify competencies required to work in health promotion. The paper briefly explains the process undertaken in 2005 to update the Australian health promotion competencies as a collaboration of several leading health promotion agencies. The article reports findings from research undertaken in 2001 and 2005 and compares trends in perceptions of health promotion competencies across time. This dialogue among researchers, health promotion academics and practitioners can help to further the impact of competencies research on professional practice in health promotion globally. This project placed a priority on methodology that engaged the health promotion workforce in Australia. A two-stage process was employed including expert consultation with 39 senior health promotion professionals, followed by a modified Delphi process to engage 400 practitioners. Space was allowed for comment on the competencies including suggested word changes, and respondents were also invited to add additional competencies. The research involved a modified Delphi study where participants were invited to rate each competency as \"essential\", \"desirable\" or \"not relevant\", and to suggest changes to wording, as well as additions to the list. Responses were received from 400 practitioners and the results were presented and compared with the 2001 survey results. Results indicate a substantial shift in perceptions about health promotion practice in Australia during the initial years of the 21(st) century.The overall significant changes in perceptions indicate that by 2005 the Australian health promotion workforce had substantially moved away from an individual behaviour-dominated perception of health promotion practice. Increasing recognition was given to competencies that reflect environmental, economic and policy influences on health, and increased recognition that these processes are legitimate and essential components of the health promotion process.</p>","PeriodicalId":79366,"journal":{"name":"Promotion & education","volume":"15 2","pages":"21-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1025382308090341","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promotion & education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1025382308090341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This important research builds on past projects in Australia and internationally that have sought to define and clarify competencies required to work in health promotion. The paper briefly explains the process undertaken in 2005 to update the Australian health promotion competencies as a collaboration of several leading health promotion agencies. The article reports findings from research undertaken in 2001 and 2005 and compares trends in perceptions of health promotion competencies across time. This dialogue among researchers, health promotion academics and practitioners can help to further the impact of competencies research on professional practice in health promotion globally. This project placed a priority on methodology that engaged the health promotion workforce in Australia. A two-stage process was employed including expert consultation with 39 senior health promotion professionals, followed by a modified Delphi process to engage 400 practitioners. Space was allowed for comment on the competencies including suggested word changes, and respondents were also invited to add additional competencies. The research involved a modified Delphi study where participants were invited to rate each competency as "essential", "desirable" or "not relevant", and to suggest changes to wording, as well as additions to the list. Responses were received from 400 practitioners and the results were presented and compared with the 2001 survey results. Results indicate a substantial shift in perceptions about health promotion practice in Australia during the initial years of the 21(st) century.The overall significant changes in perceptions indicate that by 2005 the Australian health promotion workforce had substantially moved away from an individual behaviour-dominated perception of health promotion practice. Increasing recognition was given to competencies that reflect environmental, economic and policy influences on health, and increased recognition that these processes are legitimate and essential components of the health promotion process.

2001-5年澳大利亚健康促进能力:趋势及其影响。
这项重要的研究建立在澳大利亚和国际上过去的项目的基础上,这些项目试图确定和澄清促进健康工作所需的能力。该文件简要解释了2005年为更新澳大利亚健康促进能力而开展的进程,这是几个主要健康促进机构的合作。这篇文章报告了2001年和2005年进行的研究的结果,并比较了不同时期人们对健康促进能力的看法的趋势。研究人员、健康促进学者和从业人员之间的这种对话有助于进一步推动能力研究对全球健康促进专业实践的影响。该项目优先考虑的是让澳大利亚的健康促进工作人员参与其中的方法。采用了两个阶段的过程,包括与39名高级健康促进专业人员进行专家咨询,然后采用改进的德尔菲过程,让400名从业人员参与。空格允许对能力进行评论,包括建议的单词更改,并邀请受访者添加其他能力。这项研究采用了一种改进的德尔菲研究,参与者被邀请对每项能力进行“必要”、“可取”或“不相关”的评级,并建议修改措辞,以及对列表进行补充。我们收到了400名从业员的回应,并公布了调查结果,并与2001年的调查结果进行比较。结果表明,在21(21)世纪的最初几年,对澳大利亚健康促进实践的看法发生了重大转变。看法的总体重大变化表明,到2005年,澳大利亚健康促进工作人员已经大大改变了对健康促进实践的个人行为主导的看法。越来越多地认识到反映环境、经济和政策对健康影响的能力,并越来越多地认识到这些过程是促进健康进程的合法和必要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信