Baseline assessment of organizational capacity for health promotion within regional health authorities in Alberta, Canada.

Donna Anderson, Kim D Raine, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Kay Cook, Linda Barrett, Cynthia Smith
{"title":"Baseline assessment of organizational capacity for health promotion within regional health authorities in Alberta, Canada.","authors":"Donna Anderson,&nbsp;Kim D Raine,&nbsp;Ronald C Plotnikoff,&nbsp;Kay Cook,&nbsp;Linda Barrett,&nbsp;Cynthia Smith","doi":"10.1177/1025382308090339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper provides a baseline profile of organizational capacity for (heart) health promotion in Alberta's regional health authorities (RHAs); and examines differences in perceived organizational health promotion capacity specific to modifiable risk factors across three levels of staff and across capacity levels. Baseline data were collected from a purposive sample of 144 board members, senior/middle managers and service providers from 17 RHAs participating in a five-year time-series repeated survey design assessing RHA capacity for (heart) health promotion. Results indicate low levels of capacity to take health promotion action on the broader determinants of health and risk conditions like poverty and social support. In contrast, capacity for health promotion action specific to physiological and behavioural risk factors is considerably higher. Organizational \"will\" to do health promotion is noticeably more present than is both infrastructure and leadership. Both position held within an organization as well as overall level of organizational capacity appear to influence perceptions of organizational capacity. Overall, results suggest that organizational \"will\", while necessary, is inadequate on its own for health promotion implementation to occur, especially in regard to addressing the broader determinants of health. A combination of low infrastructure and limited leadership may help explain a lack of health promotion action.</p>","PeriodicalId":79366,"journal":{"name":"Promotion & education","volume":"15 2","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1025382308090339","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promotion & education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1025382308090339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This paper provides a baseline profile of organizational capacity for (heart) health promotion in Alberta's regional health authorities (RHAs); and examines differences in perceived organizational health promotion capacity specific to modifiable risk factors across three levels of staff and across capacity levels. Baseline data were collected from a purposive sample of 144 board members, senior/middle managers and service providers from 17 RHAs participating in a five-year time-series repeated survey design assessing RHA capacity for (heart) health promotion. Results indicate low levels of capacity to take health promotion action on the broader determinants of health and risk conditions like poverty and social support. In contrast, capacity for health promotion action specific to physiological and behavioural risk factors is considerably higher. Organizational "will" to do health promotion is noticeably more present than is both infrastructure and leadership. Both position held within an organization as well as overall level of organizational capacity appear to influence perceptions of organizational capacity. Overall, results suggest that organizational "will", while necessary, is inadequate on its own for health promotion implementation to occur, especially in regard to addressing the broader determinants of health. A combination of low infrastructure and limited leadership may help explain a lack of health promotion action.

加拿大艾伯塔省区域卫生当局促进健康的组织能力基线评估。
本文提供了阿尔伯塔省地区卫生当局(RHAs)促进(心脏)健康的组织能力基线概况;并检查感知组织健康促进能力的差异,具体到可改变的风险因素,跨三个级别的工作人员和跨能力水平。基线数据收集自来自17家RHA的144名董事会成员、高级/中级管理人员和服务提供者的有目的样本,这些样本参与了评估RHA(心脏)健康促进能力的五年时间序列重复调查设计。结果表明,在贫困和社会支持等更广泛的健康决定因素和风险条件方面采取健康促进行动的能力较低。相比之下,针对生理和行为风险因素采取促进健康行动的能力要高得多。与基础设施和领导层相比,促进健康的组织“意愿”明显更为普遍。在组织中所担任的职位以及组织能力的总体水平似乎都会影响对组织能力的看法。总体而言,结果表明,组织的“意愿”虽然是必要的,但其本身不足以促进健康的实施,特别是在处理更广泛的健康决定因素方面。基础设施薄弱和领导能力有限可能有助于解释缺乏健康促进行动的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信