How have Global Health Initiatives impacted on health equity?

Johanna Hanefeld
{"title":"How have Global Health Initiatives impacted on health equity?","authors":"Johanna Hanefeld","doi":"10.1177/1025382307088094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examines the impact of Global Health Initiatives (GHIs) on health equity, focusing on low- and middle-income countries. It is a summary of a literature review commissioned by the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. GHIs have emerged during the past decade as a mechanism in development assistance for health. The review focuses on three GHIs, the US President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the World Bank's Multi-country AIDS Programme (MAP) and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria. All three have leveraged significant amounts of funding for their focal diseases - together these three GHIs provide an estimated two-thirds of external resources going to HIV/AIDS. This paper examines their impact on gender equity. An analysis of these Initiatives finds that they have a significant impact on health equity, including gender equity, through their processes of programme formulation and implementation, and through the activities they fund and implement, including through their impact on health systems and human resources. However, GHIs have so far paid insufficient attention to health inequities. While increasingly acknowledging equity, including gender equity, as a concern, Initiatives have so far failed to adequately translate this into programmes that address drivers of health inequity, including gender inequities. The review highlights the comparative advantage of individual GHIs, which point to an increased need for, and continued difficulties in, harmonisation of activities at country level. On the basis of this comparative analysis, key recommendations are made. They include a call for equity-sensitive targets, the collection of gender-disaggregated data, the use of policy-making processes for empowerment, programmes that explicitly address causes of health inequity and impact assessments of interventions' effect on social inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":79366,"journal":{"name":"Promotion & education","volume":"15 1","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1025382307088094","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promotion & education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1025382307088094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

This review examines the impact of Global Health Initiatives (GHIs) on health equity, focusing on low- and middle-income countries. It is a summary of a literature review commissioned by the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. GHIs have emerged during the past decade as a mechanism in development assistance for health. The review focuses on three GHIs, the US President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the World Bank's Multi-country AIDS Programme (MAP) and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria. All three have leveraged significant amounts of funding for their focal diseases - together these three GHIs provide an estimated two-thirds of external resources going to HIV/AIDS. This paper examines their impact on gender equity. An analysis of these Initiatives finds that they have a significant impact on health equity, including gender equity, through their processes of programme formulation and implementation, and through the activities they fund and implement, including through their impact on health systems and human resources. However, GHIs have so far paid insufficient attention to health inequities. While increasingly acknowledging equity, including gender equity, as a concern, Initiatives have so far failed to adequately translate this into programmes that address drivers of health inequity, including gender inequities. The review highlights the comparative advantage of individual GHIs, which point to an increased need for, and continued difficulties in, harmonisation of activities at country level. On the basis of this comparative analysis, key recommendations are made. They include a call for equity-sensitive targets, the collection of gender-disaggregated data, the use of policy-making processes for empowerment, programmes that explicitly address causes of health inequity and impact assessments of interventions' effect on social inequities.

全球卫生行动如何影响卫生公平?
本综述审查了全球卫生倡议(GHIs)对卫生公平的影响,重点是低收入和中等收入国家。这是世卫组织健康问题社会决定因素委员会委托进行的一项文献审查的摘要。全球健康信息系统是在过去十年中作为卫生发展援助机制出现的。该评估侧重于三个全球免疫系统:美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)、世界银行的多国艾滋病计划(MAP)和全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金。这三个机构都为其重点疾病筹集了大量资金——这三个全球卫生倡议加起来估计为艾滋病毒/艾滋病提供了三分之二的外部资源。本文探讨了它们对性别平等的影响。对这些倡议的分析发现,它们通过其规划制定和执行过程以及通过其资助和执行的活动,包括通过其对卫生系统和人力资源的影响,对卫生公平,包括性别平等产生重大影响。然而,到目前为止,全球健康信息系统对卫生不公平现象的关注不够。虽然越来越多地承认平等,包括性别平等,是一个令人关切的问题,但迄今为止,倡议未能将其充分转化为解决包括性别不平等在内的卫生不平等驱动因素的方案。审查强调了个别全球卫生保健机构的相对优势,这表明在国家一级协调活动的需要增加,但仍有困难。在此比较分析的基础上,提出了关键建议。它们包括呼吁制定对公平敏感的目标、收集按性别分列的数据、利用决策进程增强权能、制定明确处理卫生不平等原因的方案以及评估干预措施对社会不平等的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信