Evaluation of the ET-AAS and HG-AAS methods of selenium determination in vegetables

Ondrej Hegedűs , Alžbeta Hegedűsová , Silvia Šimková , Vladimír Pavlík , Klaudia Jomová
{"title":"Evaluation of the ET-AAS and HG-AAS methods of selenium determination in vegetables","authors":"Ondrej Hegedűs ,&nbsp;Alžbeta Hegedűsová ,&nbsp;Silvia Šimková ,&nbsp;Vladimír Pavlík ,&nbsp;Klaudia Jomová","doi":"10.1016/j.jprot.2008.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>ET-AAS and HG-AAS methods of selenium determination were compared and evaluated. The ET-AAS method has been followed with deuterium background correction and Zeeman background correction respectively. The following validation parameters were determined: accuracy (under repeatability conditions), trueness, calibration curve and linearity, limit of detection, limit of determination and combined standard uncertainty of the method. The HG-AAS method and the ET-AAS method with Zeeman correction were more suitable for the determination of low selenium concentrations in vegetables. The results were calculated by the standard addition method because of the strong matrix effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","volume":"70 6","pages":"Pages 1287-1291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jprot.2008.01.002","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X0700200X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

ET-AAS and HG-AAS methods of selenium determination were compared and evaluated. The ET-AAS method has been followed with deuterium background correction and Zeeman background correction respectively. The following validation parameters were determined: accuracy (under repeatability conditions), trueness, calibration curve and linearity, limit of detection, limit of determination and combined standard uncertainty of the method. The HG-AAS method and the ET-AAS method with Zeeman correction were more suitable for the determination of low selenium concentrations in vegetables. The results were calculated by the standard addition method because of the strong matrix effect.

et -原子吸收光谱法和hg -原子吸收光谱法测定蔬菜中硒的评价
对ET-AAS法和HG-AAS法测定硒进行了比较评价。对ET-AAS法分别进行了氘背景校正和Zeeman背景校正。确定以下验证参数:准确度(在重复性条件下)、准确度、校准曲线和线性、检测限、测定限和方法的联合标准不确定度。hg -原子吸收光谱法和塞曼校正的et -原子吸收光谱法更适合于蔬菜中低硒含量的测定。由于矩阵效应强,计算结果采用标准加法法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信