Arnold Gesell and the maturation controversy.

Thomas C Dalton
{"title":"Arnold Gesell and the maturation controversy.","authors":"Thomas C Dalton","doi":"10.1007/BF02915215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the work of Arnold Lucius Gesell and argues that he not only paved the way for contemporary research in motor development, but that he and colleagues anticipated fundamental issues about growth that must be addressed by psychologists and neuroscientists who are committed to the advancement of developmental science. Arnold Lucius Gesell was a pioneer in developmental psychology when the field was in its infancy. He worked diligently for the rights of physically and mentally handicapped children to receive special education that would enable them to find gainful employment. Gesell's writings in books and popular magazines increased public awareness of and support for preschool education and better foster care for orphans. Despite these achievements, many of his successors have questioned his views about infant development. Developmental psychologists have criticized Gesell for proposing a stage theory of infant growth that has fallen into disfavor among contemporary researchers. His conception of development as a maturational process has been challenged for allegedly reducing complex behavioral, perceptual, and learning processes to genetic factors. The author rejects this overly simplistic interpretation and contends that Gesell's work continues to stand the test of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73397,"journal":{"name":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02915215","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This article examines the work of Arnold Lucius Gesell and argues that he not only paved the way for contemporary research in motor development, but that he and colleagues anticipated fundamental issues about growth that must be addressed by psychologists and neuroscientists who are committed to the advancement of developmental science. Arnold Lucius Gesell was a pioneer in developmental psychology when the field was in its infancy. He worked diligently for the rights of physically and mentally handicapped children to receive special education that would enable them to find gainful employment. Gesell's writings in books and popular magazines increased public awareness of and support for preschool education and better foster care for orphans. Despite these achievements, many of his successors have questioned his views about infant development. Developmental psychologists have criticized Gesell for proposing a stage theory of infant growth that has fallen into disfavor among contemporary researchers. His conception of development as a maturational process has been challenged for allegedly reducing complex behavioral, perceptual, and learning processes to genetic factors. The author rejects this overly simplistic interpretation and contends that Gesell's work continues to stand the test of time.

阿诺德·格塞尔和成熟争议。
本文考察了阿诺德·卢修斯·格塞尔的工作,认为他不仅为当代运动发育研究铺平了道路,而且他和他的同事们预见到了关于生长的基本问题,这些问题必须由致力于发展科学进步的心理学家和神经科学家来解决。阿诺德·卢修斯·格塞尔是发展心理学领域的先驱,当时该领域还处于起步阶段。他孜孜不倦地为身体和智力有缺陷的儿童争取接受特殊教育的权利,使他们能够找到有收入的工作。格塞尔在书籍和流行杂志上的文章提高了公众对学前教育和更好的孤儿寄养的认识和支持。尽管取得了这些成就,但他的许多继任者对他关于婴儿发育的观点提出了质疑。发展心理学家批评格塞尔提出的婴儿成长阶段理论,这种理论在当代研究人员中不受欢迎。他的发展是一个成熟过程的概念受到了挑战,因为他声称将复杂的行为、感知和学习过程归结为遗传因素。作者反对这种过于简单化的解释,并认为格塞尔的工作继续经受住时间的考验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信