[The "case Hägi" at the Burghölzli in Zurich: the reaction of psychiatry and the authorities to criticism concerning state-run asylums].

Marietta Meier
{"title":"[The \"case Hägi\" at the Burghölzli in Zurich: the reaction of psychiatry and the authorities to criticism concerning state-run asylums].","authors":"Marietta Meier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1894 Gottlieb Hägi, a former guard at the mental institution Burghölzli in Zurich, published a brochure in which he heavily critizised the conditions in the asylum, its management, the board of supervision and the responsible authorities. This report attracted great public notice and led to an extended investigation. With the example of the \"case Hägi\", the present work analyzes the position of critics and defendors of mental institutions and studies the roles played by the government and the authorities in this area of conflict. Beyond this particular debate, the reaction of government and authorities at critics of the psychiatry of mental institutions after the \"case Hägi\" is investigated by an analysis of the complaints procedures against the psychiatric institutions of the canton Zurich which were initiated between 1870 and 1970. It is concluded that in complaint procedures a tight connection existed between authorities and psychiatry. In case of conflicts, the mental institutions could count on the support of the government and this played an important role for legitimating psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":81975,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"26 ","pages":"239-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1894 Gottlieb Hägi, a former guard at the mental institution Burghölzli in Zurich, published a brochure in which he heavily critizised the conditions in the asylum, its management, the board of supervision and the responsible authorities. This report attracted great public notice and led to an extended investigation. With the example of the "case Hägi", the present work analyzes the position of critics and defendors of mental institutions and studies the roles played by the government and the authorities in this area of conflict. Beyond this particular debate, the reaction of government and authorities at critics of the psychiatry of mental institutions after the "case Hägi" is investigated by an analysis of the complaints procedures against the psychiatric institutions of the canton Zurich which were initiated between 1870 and 1970. It is concluded that in complaint procedures a tight connection existed between authorities and psychiatry. In case of conflicts, the mental institutions could count on the support of the government and this played an important role for legitimating psychiatry.

[苏黎世Burghölzli的“案例Hägi”:精神病学和当局对有关国营精神病院的批评的反应]。
1894年,戈特利布Hägi,苏黎世精神病院Burghölzli的一名前警卫,出版了一本小册子,严厉批评了精神病院的条件、管理、监督委员会和负责当局。这份报告引起了公众的极大关注,并引发了一场广泛的调查。本文以“Hägi案例”为例,分析了精神病院的批评者和捍卫者的立场,并研究了政府和当局在这一冲突领域所发挥的作用。除了这一特殊辩论之外,通过对1870年至1970年间发起的针对苏黎世州精神病院的投诉程序的分析,调查了政府和当局在“Hägi案件”之后对精神病院精神病学批评者的反应。结论是,在申诉程序中,当局和精神病学之间存在着紧密的联系。在发生冲突的情况下,精神病院可以依靠政府的支持,这在使精神病学合法化方面发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信