Occupational accidents and forensic medicine in Turkey

Haluk İnce PhD (Specialist Doctor) , Nurhan İnce (Associate Professor) , Bedia Ayhan Ozyildirim (Professor)
{"title":"Occupational accidents and forensic medicine in Turkey","authors":"Haluk İnce PhD (Specialist Doctor) ,&nbsp;Nurhan İnce (Associate Professor) ,&nbsp;Bedia Ayhan Ozyildirim (Professor)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Turkey, evaluation of the ratio of loss of working capacity is made according to various laws and regulations. These laws and regulations use different standards in computing the above-mentioned ratio depending on the professional status of the worker, whether he or she is a member of SSK (Social Security Institution) or ES (The Retirement Pension Institution) system.</p><p>The aim of this study is to point out at the differences and deficiencies in computing the degree of disability and at the need to bring common standards to these computations. This prospective descriptive research is based on the cases of occupational accidents and occupational diseases brought to the 3rd specialized branch of the Institution of Forensic Medicine (which is the highest ruling instance concerning the decision on this field). Of the 164 accident cases included in this research, 95.1% are males, and 4.9% females. According to distribution by age of the cases, the modal group is respectively (30–39) years for men and (12–19) years for women. 43.8% of the injuries were localized at the hand or wrist.</p><p>No meaningful statistical relationship could be found between the level of qualification of the workers (skilled–unskilled) and the proportion of those suffering from total disability. For the cases included in the categories 3, 4 and 5 is the ES system; the ratio of disability was similar to those computed according to the SSK system. In conclusion, we would like to insist on the need for our country to amend our laws and regulations according to changing and prevailing conditions and sex differentials and to bring homogeneous standards for all workers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical forensic medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"Pages 326-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.06.017","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical forensic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353113106001611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In Turkey, evaluation of the ratio of loss of working capacity is made according to various laws and regulations. These laws and regulations use different standards in computing the above-mentioned ratio depending on the professional status of the worker, whether he or she is a member of SSK (Social Security Institution) or ES (The Retirement Pension Institution) system.

The aim of this study is to point out at the differences and deficiencies in computing the degree of disability and at the need to bring common standards to these computations. This prospective descriptive research is based on the cases of occupational accidents and occupational diseases brought to the 3rd specialized branch of the Institution of Forensic Medicine (which is the highest ruling instance concerning the decision on this field). Of the 164 accident cases included in this research, 95.1% are males, and 4.9% females. According to distribution by age of the cases, the modal group is respectively (30–39) years for men and (12–19) years for women. 43.8% of the injuries were localized at the hand or wrist.

No meaningful statistical relationship could be found between the level of qualification of the workers (skilled–unskilled) and the proportion of those suffering from total disability. For the cases included in the categories 3, 4 and 5 is the ES system; the ratio of disability was similar to those computed according to the SSK system. In conclusion, we would like to insist on the need for our country to amend our laws and regulations according to changing and prevailing conditions and sex differentials and to bring homogeneous standards for all workers.

土耳其的职业事故和法医
在土耳其,根据各种法律法规对工作能力损失率进行评估。这些法律法规在计算上述比例时,根据劳动者的职业地位,是社会保障机构(SSK)成员还是退休养老金机构(ES)成员,使用了不同的标准。本研究的目的是指出在计算残疾程度方面的差异和不足,以及为这些计算带来共同标准的必要性。这项前瞻性描述性研究是根据提交给法医研究所第三专业分院的职业事故和职业病案例(这是有关这一领域决定的最高裁决案例)进行的。本研究纳入的164例事故中,男性占95.1%,女性占4.9%。根据病例的年龄分布,模态组男性为(30-39)岁,女性为(12-19)岁。43.8%的损伤集中在手腕部。在工人的资格水平(熟练工人-非熟练工人)和完全残疾的工人所占比例之间找不到有意义的统计关系。对于第3、4和5类的情况,采用ES系统;残障率与根据SSK系统计算的残障率相似。最后,我们要坚持认为,我国有必要根据不断变化和普遍存在的情况和性别差异修改我国的法律和条例,并为所有工人制定相同的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信