[Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section -- piperacillin versus piperacillin/tazobactam in 300 cesarean sections].

K J Wagner, U Bier, R Callies, P A Regidor, A E Schindler
{"title":"[Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section -- piperacillin versus piperacillin/tazobactam in 300 cesarean sections].","authors":"K J Wagner,&nbsp;U Bier,&nbsp;R Callies,&nbsp;P A Regidor,&nbsp;A E Schindler","doi":"10.1055/s-2005-872566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis is a standard procedure in obstetric surgery and has been discussed in various investigations. Use of treatment is judged by high efficacy and good tolerance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In 300 patients undergoing cesarean sections we compared results of application of Piperacillin 4 g and Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5 g after cut of umbilical cord. Tazobactam/Piperacillin is a combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor with increased toxicity against staph. aureus, enterobacter, and other germs responsible for local and systemic infections in obstetric surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not observe any severe adverse effects. Rate of severe wound infections was 1.3 % (Tazobactam/Piperacillin) and 2 % (Piperacillin alone). The difference showed no statistic significance (p > 0.01). During postoperative course we found a higher increase of CRP (p < 0.01) in the Piperacillin group. CRP proved to be a useful objective parameter to distinguish between patients with or without postoperative infections. No differences were found in the number of leucocytes, time in hospital and other parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23881,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie","volume":"128 3","pages":"149-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-872566","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Antibiotic prophylaxis is a standard procedure in obstetric surgery and has been discussed in various investigations. Use of treatment is judged by high efficacy and good tolerance.

Method: In 300 patients undergoing cesarean sections we compared results of application of Piperacillin 4 g and Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5 g after cut of umbilical cord. Tazobactam/Piperacillin is a combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor with increased toxicity against staph. aureus, enterobacter, and other germs responsible for local and systemic infections in obstetric surgery.

Results: We did not observe any severe adverse effects. Rate of severe wound infections was 1.3 % (Tazobactam/Piperacillin) and 2 % (Piperacillin alone). The difference showed no statistic significance (p > 0.01). During postoperative course we found a higher increase of CRP (p < 0.01) in the Piperacillin group. CRP proved to be a useful objective parameter to distinguish between patients with or without postoperative infections. No differences were found in the number of leucocytes, time in hospital and other parameters.

剖宫产术中的抗生素预防——300例剖宫产术中哌拉西林与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的比较
前言:抗生素预防是产科手术的标准程序,并在各种调查中进行了讨论。以疗效高、耐受性好为判断标准。方法:对300例剖宫产患者剖宫产后剪脐带后应用哌拉西林4 g与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦4.5 g的效果进行比较。他唑巴坦/哌拉西林是广谱青霉素和β -内酰胺酶抑制剂的组合,对葡萄球菌的毒性增加。产科手术中引起局部和全身感染的金黄色葡萄球菌、肠杆菌和其他细菌。结果:未见严重不良反应。严重伤口感染率为1.3%(他唑巴坦/哌拉西林)和2%(哌拉西林单用)。差异无统计学意义(p > 0.01)。术后,我们发现哌拉西林组CRP升高较高(p < 0.01)。CRP被证明是一个有用的客观参数,以区分患者是否术后感染。白细胞数、住院时间等指标均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信