Building Community in the HIV Online Intervention Space: Lessons From the HealthMPowerment Intervention.

Natalie A Blackburn, Willa Dong, Megan Threats, Megan Barry, Sara LeGrand, Lisa B Hightow-Weidman, Karina Soni, Deren V Pulley, Jose A Bauermeister, Kate Muessig
{"title":"Building Community in the HIV Online Intervention Space: Lessons From the HealthMPowerment Intervention.","authors":"Natalie A Blackburn,&nbsp;Willa Dong,&nbsp;Megan Threats,&nbsp;Megan Barry,&nbsp;Sara LeGrand,&nbsp;Lisa B Hightow-Weidman,&nbsp;Karina Soni,&nbsp;Deren V Pulley,&nbsp;Jose A Bauermeister,&nbsp;Kate Muessig","doi":"10.1177/10901981211003859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health platforms can facilitate social support and address HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) stigma but pose challenges for intervention design and participant engagement. Giddens's structuration theory, that individuals are shaped by-and shape-their communities through rules and resources that give them power to operate within these environments, provides a useful analytic framework for exploring these dynamic intervention spaces.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were drawn from an online randomized controlled trial intervention (HealthMpowerment) for young Black men who have sex with men to reduce condomless anal intercourse. We applied a conversational analysis informed by structuration theory to 65 user-generated conversations that included stigma content. We aimed to understand how the interdependent relationship between the intervention space and participants' contributions might contribute to behavior change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty five intervention participants contributed to the analyzed conversations. Our analysis identified three types of conversational processes that may underlie behavior change: (1) Through intervention engagement, participants established norms and expectations that shaped their discussions; (2) participants used anecdotes and anonymity to reinforce norms; and (3) intervention staff members sought to improve engagement and build knowledge by initiating discussions and correcting misinformation, thus playing an integral role in the online community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lens of structuration theory usefully reveals potential behavior change mechanisms within the social interactions of an online intervention. Future design of these interventions to address HIV stigma should explicitly characterize the context in which individuals (study staff and participants) engage with one another in order to assess whether these processes are associated with improved intervention outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520637,"journal":{"name":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"604-614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10901981211003859","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211003859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Mobile health platforms can facilitate social support and address HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) stigma but pose challenges for intervention design and participant engagement. Giddens's structuration theory, that individuals are shaped by-and shape-their communities through rules and resources that give them power to operate within these environments, provides a useful analytic framework for exploring these dynamic intervention spaces.

Method: Data were drawn from an online randomized controlled trial intervention (HealthMpowerment) for young Black men who have sex with men to reduce condomless anal intercourse. We applied a conversational analysis informed by structuration theory to 65 user-generated conversations that included stigma content. We aimed to understand how the interdependent relationship between the intervention space and participants' contributions might contribute to behavior change.

Results: Thirty five intervention participants contributed to the analyzed conversations. Our analysis identified three types of conversational processes that may underlie behavior change: (1) Through intervention engagement, participants established norms and expectations that shaped their discussions; (2) participants used anecdotes and anonymity to reinforce norms; and (3) intervention staff members sought to improve engagement and build knowledge by initiating discussions and correcting misinformation, thus playing an integral role in the online community.

Conclusions: The lens of structuration theory usefully reveals potential behavior change mechanisms within the social interactions of an online intervention. Future design of these interventions to address HIV stigma should explicitly characterize the context in which individuals (study staff and participants) engage with one another in order to assess whether these processes are associated with improved intervention outcomes.

Abstract Image

在艾滋病毒在线干预空间中建立社区:来自HealthMPowerment干预的教训。
背景:移动卫生平台可以促进社会支持和解决艾滋病毒(人类免疫缺陷病毒)耻辱,但对干预设计和参与者参与构成挑战。吉登斯的结构理论认为,个人是通过赋予他们在这些环境中运作的权力的规则和资源被他们的社区塑造和塑造的,这为探索这些动态干预空间提供了一个有用的分析框架。方法:数据来自于一项在线随机对照试验干预(HealthMpowerment),该干预旨在减少与男性发生性行为的年轻黑人男性无安全套肛交。我们运用结构化理论对65个包含病耻感内容的用户生成对话进行会话分析。我们的目的是了解干预空间和参与者的贡献之间的相互依存关系如何有助于行为改变。结果:35名干预参与者对分析的对话做出了贡献。我们的分析确定了三种类型的会话过程可能是行为改变的基础:(1)通过干预参与,参与者建立了规范和期望,塑造了他们的讨论;(2)参与者使用轶事和匿名强化规范;(3)干预工作人员试图通过发起讨论和纠正错误信息来提高参与度和建立知识,从而在在线社区中发挥不可或缺的作用。结论:结构理论的视角有效地揭示了在线干预的社会互动中潜在的行为改变机制。未来设计这些解决HIV污名的干预措施时,应明确描述个体(研究人员和参与者)相互接触的背景,以评估这些过程是否与改善的干预结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信