Task Sharing of Injectable Contraception Services in Pakistan: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Studies in Family Planning Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-19 DOI:10.1111/sifp.12149
Dawn S Chin-Quee, Farina Abrejo, Mario Chen, Talib Lashari, Patrick Olsen, Zaheer Habib, Xiaoming Gao, Fauzia Assad, Farid Midhet, Shabir Chandio, Kayla Stankevitz, Sarah Saleem
{"title":"Task Sharing of Injectable Contraception Services in Pakistan: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Dawn S Chin-Quee,&nbsp;Farina Abrejo,&nbsp;Mario Chen,&nbsp;Talib Lashari,&nbsp;Patrick Olsen,&nbsp;Zaheer Habib,&nbsp;Xiaoming Gao,&nbsp;Fauzia Assad,&nbsp;Farid Midhet,&nbsp;Shabir Chandio,&nbsp;Kayla Stankevitz,&nbsp;Sarah Saleem","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Provision of injectable contraceptive services by lay health workers is endorsed by normative bodies, but support for this practice is not universal. We assessed whether lay providers (lady health workers, LHWs) could perform as well as clinically trained providers (family welfare workers, FWWs) on appropriate screening, counseling, and injection of intramuscular and subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) using a randomized controlled trial. In the urban sample (n = 355), 88 percent of FWW DMPA clients were appropriately screened versus 77 percent of LHW clients (noninferiority test p = 0.88). In rural facilities (n = 105), over 90 percent of both providers' clients were screened appropriately. Appropriate counseling was low overall, but LHWs were significantly noninferior to FWWs (p = 0.003). Notably, LHWs demonstrated better injection technique than FWWs. We could not conclude that LHWs screened new DMPA users as well as FWWs from an urban sample of providers but results from the rural sample suggests that service delivery context played an important role.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"52 1","pages":"23-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/sifp.12149","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Provision of injectable contraceptive services by lay health workers is endorsed by normative bodies, but support for this practice is not universal. We assessed whether lay providers (lady health workers, LHWs) could perform as well as clinically trained providers (family welfare workers, FWWs) on appropriate screening, counseling, and injection of intramuscular and subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) using a randomized controlled trial. In the urban sample (n = 355), 88 percent of FWW DMPA clients were appropriately screened versus 77 percent of LHW clients (noninferiority test p = 0.88). In rural facilities (n = 105), over 90 percent of both providers' clients were screened appropriately. Appropriate counseling was low overall, but LHWs were significantly noninferior to FWWs (p = 0.003). Notably, LHWs demonstrated better injection technique than FWWs. We could not conclude that LHWs screened new DMPA users as well as FWWs from an urban sample of providers but results from the rural sample suggests that service delivery context played an important role.

巴基斯坦注射避孕服务的任务分配:一项随机对照试验。
非专业卫生工作者提供注射避孕服务得到了规范机构的认可,但对这种做法的支持并不普遍。我们通过一项随机对照试验,评估非专业医务人员(女性卫生工作者,LHWs)在适当的筛查、咨询以及肌内和皮下注射醋酸甲孕酮(DMPA)方面的表现是否与临床训练有素的医务人员(家庭福利工作者,FWWs)一样好。在城市样本(n = 355)中,88%的FWW DMPA患者接受了适当的筛查,而77%的LHW患者接受了适当的筛查(非效性检验p = 0.88)。在农村设施(n = 105), 90%以上的两家提供者的客户得到了适当的筛查。总体而言,适当的咨询较低,但LHWs明显优于FWWs (p = 0.003)。值得注意的是,LHWs的注入技术优于FWWs。我们不能得出结论,从城市样本的提供者中,LHWs筛选新的DMPA用户和fww,但来自农村样本的结果表明,服务提供环境发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信