Never Screened: Understanding Breast Cancer Nonadherence in Puerto Rico.

Alelí M Ayala-Marín, Vivian Colón-López, Camille Vélez-Álamo, Natalie Fernández-Espada, Angela Pattatucci, María E Fernández
{"title":"Never Screened: Understanding Breast Cancer Nonadherence in Puerto Rico.","authors":"Alelí M Ayala-Marín,&nbsp;Vivian Colón-López,&nbsp;Camille Vélez-Álamo,&nbsp;Natalie Fernández-Espada,&nbsp;Angela Pattatucci,&nbsp;María E Fernández","doi":"10.1177/1090198120988248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women in Puerto Rico (PR). The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with never screened status among a sample of women nonadherent to the 2013 American Cancer Society guidelines. The inclusion criteria for this study were being a woman (1) aged ≥40 years old and (2) nonadherent to breast cancer screening guidelines. We used baseline data from participants (<i>N</i> = 300; aged ≥40 years old) enrolled in the intervention trial <i>Cultivando la Salud</i>, implemented in Canóvanas, Puerto Rico, from 2012 to 2014. We used multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors associated with never screening status, adjusting by sociodemographical variables and psychosocial constructs about mammography (self-efficacy, beliefs about mammography pros [benefits] and cons [disadvantages], and subjective norms) as well as by health care insurance, usual source of care, and Pap test adherence. Among nonadherent women, 18.0% reported never having a mammography. Never screened women were significantly younger than previously screened women (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR] = 7.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): [2.38, 22.50]) and almost four times as likely to have the governmental health plan (GHP; aPOR = 3.78, 95% CI: [1.15, 12.46]). In addition, never screened women perceived more cons (disadvantages) to mammography than previously screened women (aPOR = 1.81, 95% CI: [1.18, 2.78]). We found that women who were younger, had GHP insurance, and had higher levels of beliefs against mammography were more likely to have never been screened. Results from this study can be used to target never screened women with health education messages addressing perceived cons of mammography. Additionally, women with GHP insurance may experience disparities in health care access and should be targeted with policies that facilitate access to mammography screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":520637,"journal":{"name":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"559-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1090198120988248","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120988248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women in Puerto Rico (PR). The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with never screened status among a sample of women nonadherent to the 2013 American Cancer Society guidelines. The inclusion criteria for this study were being a woman (1) aged ≥40 years old and (2) nonadherent to breast cancer screening guidelines. We used baseline data from participants (N = 300; aged ≥40 years old) enrolled in the intervention trial Cultivando la Salud, implemented in Canóvanas, Puerto Rico, from 2012 to 2014. We used multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors associated with never screening status, adjusting by sociodemographical variables and psychosocial constructs about mammography (self-efficacy, beliefs about mammography pros [benefits] and cons [disadvantages], and subjective norms) as well as by health care insurance, usual source of care, and Pap test adherence. Among nonadherent women, 18.0% reported never having a mammography. Never screened women were significantly younger than previously screened women (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR] = 7.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): [2.38, 22.50]) and almost four times as likely to have the governmental health plan (GHP; aPOR = 3.78, 95% CI: [1.15, 12.46]). In addition, never screened women perceived more cons (disadvantages) to mammography than previously screened women (aPOR = 1.81, 95% CI: [1.18, 2.78]). We found that women who were younger, had GHP insurance, and had higher levels of beliefs against mammography were more likely to have never been screened. Results from this study can be used to target never screened women with health education messages addressing perceived cons of mammography. Additionally, women with GHP insurance may experience disparities in health care access and should be targeted with policies that facilitate access to mammography screening.

从未筛查:了解波多黎各的乳腺癌不依从。
乳腺癌是波多黎各妇女中最常见的癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。本研究的目的是在未遵守2013年美国癌症协会指南的女性样本中确定与未筛查状态相关的因素。本研究的纳入标准为女性(1)年龄≥40岁;(2)不遵守乳腺癌筛查指南。我们使用参与者的基线数据(N = 300;年龄≥40岁),参加2012 - 2014年在波多黎各Canóvanas实施的干预试验culrando la Salud。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与从未筛查状态相关的因素,并根据社会人口学变量和乳房x光检查的心理社会结构(自我效能、对乳房x光检查利弊的信念和主观规范)以及医疗保险、通常的护理来源和巴氏试验依从性进行调整。在未依从的女性中,18.0%的人报告从未接受过乳房x光检查。从未接受过筛查的女性明显比接受过筛查的女性年轻(调整后的患病率优势比[aPOR] = 7.32, 95%可信区间(CI):[2.38, 22.50]),接受政府健康计划(GHP;aPOR = 3.78, 95% CI:[1.15, 12.46])。此外,从未筛查过的女性比之前筛查过的女性认为乳房x光检查有更多的缺点(aPOR = 1.81, 95% CI:[1.18, 2.78])。我们发现,年轻、有GHP保险、对乳房x光检查抱有更高信念的女性更有可能从未接受过筛查。本研究的结果可用于针对从未筛查过的妇女提供健康教育信息,以解决乳房x光检查的已知缺点。此外,拥有全民健康保险的妇女在获得保健服务方面可能会遇到差异,因此应制定有助于获得乳房x光检查的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信