Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study.

Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research Pub Date : 2020-12-31 eCollection Date: 2020-10-01 DOI:10.5037/jomr.2020.11402
Renzo Guarnieri, Luca Savio, Alessandro Bermonds, Luca Testarelli
{"title":"Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study.","authors":"Renzo Guarnieri,&nbsp;Luca Savio,&nbsp;Alessandro Bermonds,&nbsp;Luca Testarelli","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2020.11402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to compare clinical outcomes, soft tissues conditions and differences in marginal bone loss between implants with a laser-microgrooved collar placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, over a period of 5 years after functional loading.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients of Group 1 underwent extractions with sockets preservation using porcine-derived bone, covered with collagen membrane. Group 2 underwent extractions without socket preservation. Patients of Group 1 received implants in grafted sites, and Group 2 received implants in spontaneously healed bone using a maxillary sinus lift with crestal approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the observation period, the overall clinical success rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 98% and 100%, respectively, with no differences between the procedures and implants used. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0.03 to 0.39 mm after 60 months of functional loading. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between short and standard-length implants placed in grafted extraction sockets and in pristine bone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short and standard implants with a laser-microgrooved collar, placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, exhibited no statistical difference in success rate, clinical parameters and marginal bone loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":230885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/ec/jomr-11-e2.PMC7875103.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to compare clinical outcomes, soft tissues conditions and differences in marginal bone loss between implants with a laser-microgrooved collar placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, over a period of 5 years after functional loading.

Material and methods: Patients of Group 1 underwent extractions with sockets preservation using porcine-derived bone, covered with collagen membrane. Group 2 underwent extractions without socket preservation. Patients of Group 1 received implants in grafted sites, and Group 2 received implants in spontaneously healed bone using a maxillary sinus lift with crestal approach.

Results: Over the observation period, the overall clinical success rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 98% and 100%, respectively, with no differences between the procedures and implants used. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0.03 to 0.39 mm after 60 months of functional loading. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between short and standard-length implants placed in grafted extraction sockets and in pristine bone.

Conclusions: Short and standard implants with a laser-microgrooved collar, placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, exhibited no statistical difference in success rate, clinical parameters and marginal bone loss.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在上颌后拔牙槽和牙槽鼻窦中植入激光微槽环:一项5年多中心回顾性研究。
目的:这项回顾性多中心队列研究的目的是比较临床结果、软组织状况和边缘骨丢失的差异,在功能负荷后的5年时间里,在上颌后牙拔牙槽内放置激光微槽套4至5个月,在上颌后牙拔牙槽内放置激光微槽套,在上颌后牙拔牙槽内放置激光微槽套,在上颌后牙拔牙槽内放置原始骨(上颌后牙拔牙槽自发愈合)。材料和方法:第一组患者采用猪源性骨,覆盖胶原膜,保留骨臼。第二组在不保留牙槽的情况下进行拔牙。组1患者在移植部位植入种植体,组2患者在自行愈合的骨中植入种植体,采用上颌窦提升与嵴入路。结果:观察期内,组1和组2的整体临床成功率分别为98%和100%,手术方式和种植体无差异。60个月的功能负荷后,累积x线片边缘骨损失范围为0.03至0.39 mm。短种植体和标准长度种植体放置在移植拔牙槽和原始骨中,在边缘骨丢失方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:采用激光微槽领的短标准种植体,放置于植骨4 ~ 5个月的上颌后拔牙槽内,与采用截骨术诱导窦底提升的上颌后原始骨(自行愈合的上颌后拔牙槽内),在成功率、临床参数和边缘骨丢失方面无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信