Evaluation of TReatment With Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and the Risk of Lung Cancer: ERACER-An Observational Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jeffrey L Anderson, Kirk U Knowlton, J Brent Muhlestein, Tami L Bair, Viet T Le, Benjamin D Horne
{"title":"<i>E</i>valuation of T<i>R</i>eatment With <i>A</i>ngiotensin <i>C</i>onverting <i>E</i>nzyme Inhibitors and the <i>R</i>isk of Lung Cancer: ERACER-An Observational Cohort Study.","authors":"Jeffrey L Anderson,&nbsp;Kirk U Knowlton,&nbsp;J Brent Muhlestein,&nbsp;Tami L Bair,&nbsp;Viet T Le,&nbsp;Benjamin D Horne","doi":"10.1177/1074248420987054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are widely prescribed medications. A recent British study reported a 14% increased risk of lung cancer with ACEI versus angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) prescriptions, and risk increased with longer use. We sought to validate this observation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the Intermountain Enterprise Data Warehouse from 1996 to 2018 for patients newly treated with an ACEI or an ARB and with ≥1 year's follow-up or to incident lung cancer or death. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for lung cancer and for lung cancer or all-cause mortality were calculated for ACEIs compared to ARBs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 187,060 patients met entry criteria (age 60.2 ± 15.1 y; 51% women). During a mean of 7.1 years follow-up (max: 20.0 years), 3,039 lung cancers and 43,505 deaths occurred. Absolute lung cancer rates were 2.16 and 2.31 per 1000 patient-years in the ARB and ACEI groups, respectively. The HR of lung cancer was modestly increased with ACEIs (unadjusted HR = 1.11, CI: 1.02, 1.22, <i>P</i> = .014; adjusted HR = 1.18, CI: 1.06, 1.31, <i>P</i> = .002; number needed to harm [NNH] 6,667). Rates of the composite of lung cancer or death over time also favored ARBs. Lung cancer event curves separated gradually over longitudinal follow-up beginning at 10-12 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We noted a small long-term increase in lung cancer risk with ACEIs compared with ARBs. Separation of survival curves was delayed until 10-12 years after treatment initiation. Although the observed increases in lung cancer risk are small, implications are potentially important because of the broad use of ACEIs. Thus, additional work to validate these findings is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 4","pages":"321-327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1074248420987054","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248420987054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are widely prescribed medications. A recent British study reported a 14% increased risk of lung cancer with ACEI versus angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) prescriptions, and risk increased with longer use. We sought to validate this observation.

Methods: We searched the Intermountain Enterprise Data Warehouse from 1996 to 2018 for patients newly treated with an ACEI or an ARB and with ≥1 year's follow-up or to incident lung cancer or death. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for lung cancer and for lung cancer or all-cause mortality were calculated for ACEIs compared to ARBs.

Results: A total of 187,060 patients met entry criteria (age 60.2 ± 15.1 y; 51% women). During a mean of 7.1 years follow-up (max: 20.0 years), 3,039 lung cancers and 43,505 deaths occurred. Absolute lung cancer rates were 2.16 and 2.31 per 1000 patient-years in the ARB and ACEI groups, respectively. The HR of lung cancer was modestly increased with ACEIs (unadjusted HR = 1.11, CI: 1.02, 1.22, P = .014; adjusted HR = 1.18, CI: 1.06, 1.31, P = .002; number needed to harm [NNH] 6,667). Rates of the composite of lung cancer or death over time also favored ARBs. Lung cancer event curves separated gradually over longitudinal follow-up beginning at 10-12 years.

Conclusions: We noted a small long-term increase in lung cancer risk with ACEIs compared with ARBs. Separation of survival curves was delayed until 10-12 years after treatment initiation. Although the observed increases in lung cancer risk are small, implications are potentially important because of the broad use of ACEIs. Thus, additional work to validate these findings is needed.

评价血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗与肺癌风险:erace -一项观察性队列研究。
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)是广泛使用的处方药。英国最近的一项研究报告,与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)处方相比,ACEI的肺癌风险增加了14%,并且随着使用时间的延长,风险增加。我们试图验证这一观察结果。方法:我们检索了1996年至2018年Intermountain Enterprise数据仓库中新接受ACEI或ARB治疗且随访≥1年或发生肺癌或死亡的患者。计算acei与arb的肺癌、肺癌或全因死亡率的未调整和调整风险比(hr)。结果:共有187,060例患者符合入组标准(年龄60.2±15.1岁;51%的女性)。在平均7.1年的随访期间(最长20.0年),发生了3,039例肺癌和43,505例死亡。ARB组和ACEI组的绝对肺癌发病率分别为2.16和2.31 / 1000患者-年。肺癌的HR随acei轻度升高(未经调整的HR = 1.11, CI: 1.02, 1.22, P = 0.014;调整后HR = 1.18, CI: 1.06, 1.31, P = 0.002;伤害所需的数量[NNH] 6,667)。随着时间的推移,肺癌或死亡率的综合比率也有利于arb。从10-12年开始的纵向随访中,肺癌事件曲线逐渐分离。结论:我们注意到与arb相比,acei的肺癌风险有小幅长期增加。生存曲线的分离延迟至治疗开始后10-12年。虽然观察到的肺癌风险增加很小,但由于acei的广泛使用,其潜在意义很重要。因此,需要额外的工作来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信