The validation of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary multivessel disease: a comparison with SPECT and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography.

I Erhard, J Rieber, P Jung, M Hacker, T Schiele, H-U Stempfle, A König, M Baylacher, K Theisen, U Siebert, V Klauss
{"title":"The validation of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary multivessel disease: a comparison with SPECT and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography.","authors":"I Erhard,&nbsp;J Rieber,&nbsp;P Jung,&nbsp;M Hacker,&nbsp;T Schiele,&nbsp;H-U Stempfle,&nbsp;A König,&nbsp;M Baylacher,&nbsp;K Theisen,&nbsp;U Siebert,&nbsp;V Klauss","doi":"10.1007/s00392-005-0213-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a new but well established parameter for the hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses. A FFR below 0.75 was validated as functionally significant in coronary one or two vessel disease. This study was designed to prospectively define the best FFR cut off value (BCV) in patients with multivessel disease using two noninvasive tests, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT) and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) as reference methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>47 symptomatic patients (29 male, mean age 64+/-10 yrs) with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (50-75% diameter stenosis) entered the study. DSE (5-40 microg/min/kg dobutamine) was performed after intravenous injection of a second generation transpulmonary contrast agent. SPECT (Tc-99m-MIBI) was done at peak stress. All tests (DSE, SPECT and FFR) were performed within 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SPECT yielded positive results in 15 and DSE in 16 patients, respectively. Mean FFR measured in the target lesion (RCA n=10; LAD n=22, RCX n=15) was 0.80+/-0.13. FFR was <0.75 in 15 patients. By performing a ROC analysis the BCV (highest sum of sensitivity and specificity) was found at 0.75. At this cut off value using both non-invasive tests as reference method, sensitivity and specificity were 83 and 77%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with multivessel disease, a FFR <0.75 identifies a hemodynamically relevant lesion as compared to DSE and SPECT. This study underlines that FFR criteria are also applicable in patients with complex coronary artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23757,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","volume":"94 5","pages":"321-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00392-005-0213-6","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-005-0213-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Unlabelled: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a new but well established parameter for the hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses. A FFR below 0.75 was validated as functionally significant in coronary one or two vessel disease. This study was designed to prospectively define the best FFR cut off value (BCV) in patients with multivessel disease using two noninvasive tests, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT) and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) as reference methods.

Methods: 47 symptomatic patients (29 male, mean age 64+/-10 yrs) with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (50-75% diameter stenosis) entered the study. DSE (5-40 microg/min/kg dobutamine) was performed after intravenous injection of a second generation transpulmonary contrast agent. SPECT (Tc-99m-MIBI) was done at peak stress. All tests (DSE, SPECT and FFR) were performed within 4 weeks.

Results: SPECT yielded positive results in 15 and DSE in 16 patients, respectively. Mean FFR measured in the target lesion (RCA n=10; LAD n=22, RCX n=15) was 0.80+/-0.13. FFR was <0.75 in 15 patients. By performing a ROC analysis the BCV (highest sum of sensitivity and specificity) was found at 0.75. At this cut off value using both non-invasive tests as reference method, sensitivity and specificity were 83 and 77%.

Conclusion: In patients with multivessel disease, a FFR <0.75 identifies a hemodynamically relevant lesion as compared to DSE and SPECT. This study underlines that FFR criteria are also applicable in patients with complex coronary artery disease.

冠状动脉多支血管疾病患者血流储备分数的验证:SPECT和增强多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图的比较
未标记:分数血流储备(FFR)是一种新的但建立良好的冠状动脉狭窄血流动力学评价参数。FFR低于0.75被认为在冠状动脉单侧或双侧血管疾病中具有显著的功能。本研究旨在以心肌灌注显像(SPECT)和对比增强多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图(DSE)两种无创检查作为参考,前瞻性地确定多血管疾病患者的最佳FFR截断值(BCV)。方法:47例有症状的冠状动脉造影中度病变(直径狭窄50-75%)患者(男性29例,平均年龄64+/-10岁)进入研究。静脉注射第二代经肺造影剂后行DSE(5-40微克/分钟/千克多巴酚丁胺)。在峰值应力下进行SPECT (Tc-99m-MIBI)。所有测试(DSE、SPECT和FFR)均在4周内完成。结果:SPECT阳性15例,DSE阳性16例。靶病变测得的平均FFR (RCA n=10;LAD n=22, RCX n=15)为0.80±0.13。结论:在多血管疾病患者中,FFR为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信