Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words.

Michael J Cortese, April Fugett
{"title":"Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words.","authors":"Michael J Cortese,&nbsp;April Fugett","doi":"10.3758/bf03195585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imageability ratings made on a 1-7 scale and reaction times for 3,000 monosyllabic words were obtained from 31 participants. Analyses comparing these ratings to 1,153 common words from Toglia and Battig (1978) indicate that these ratings are valid. Reliability was assessed (alpha = .95). The information obtained in this study adds to that of other normative studies and is useful to researchers interested in manipulating or controlling imageability in word recognition and memory studies. These norms can be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.</p>","PeriodicalId":79800,"journal":{"name":"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc","volume":"36 3","pages":"384-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3758/bf03195585","citationCount":"294","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 294

Abstract

Imageability ratings made on a 1-7 scale and reaction times for 3,000 monosyllabic words were obtained from 31 participants. Analyses comparing these ratings to 1,153 common words from Toglia and Battig (1978) indicate that these ratings are valid. Reliability was assessed (alpha = .95). The information obtained in this study adds to that of other normative studies and is useful to researchers interested in manipulating or controlling imageability in word recognition and memory studies. These norms can be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.

对3000个单音节单词的可想象性进行评级。
从31名参与者中获得了3000个单音节单词的可想象性评分和反应时间,评分范围为1-7。将这些评级与Toglia和Battig(1978)的1153个常用词进行比较,表明这些评级是有效的。评估信度(alpha = 0.95)。本研究获得的信息补充了其他规范性研究的信息,对那些对操纵或控制词识别和记忆研究中的可想象性感兴趣的研究人员很有用。这些规范可以从www.psychonomic.org/archive/下载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信