Multiple patch-test reactions: a pilot evaluation of a combination approach to visualize patterns of multiple sensitivity in patch-test databases and a proposal for a multiple sensitivity index.

Heinrich Dickel, James S Taylor, David R Bickers, Hans F Merk, Thomas M Bruckner
{"title":"Multiple patch-test reactions: a pilot evaluation of a combination approach to visualize patterns of multiple sensitivity in patch-test databases and a proposal for a multiple sensitivity index.","authors":"Heinrich Dickel,&nbsp;James S Taylor,&nbsp;David R Bickers,&nbsp;Hans F Merk,&nbsp;Thomas M Bruckner","doi":"10.2310/6620.2003.6166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The variety of patterns of multiple sensitivity in patch-test data remains poorly defined. Studies addressing this topic have primarily concerned the occurrence of pairs of allergens, and some reports hypothesize a predisposing factor that influences the individual sensitivity of patients to multiple reactions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to address this topic by reanalyzing a matched data set from two patch-test units in Cleveland, OH, and one unit in Cologne, Germany, focusing on multiple reactions to identical allergens of the standard screening trays over the same 4-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the statistical FREQ procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), we propose a program for addressing the difficulties in computing and visualizing patterns of multiple sensitivity. Additionally, we propose the \"multiple sensitivity index\" (MSI) as an absolute measure for characterizing the occurrence of an allergen with others on a selected panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the seventeen allergens examined, 131072 possible combinations were evaluated in a total of 2881 patients. Of patients tested, 12.4% had multiple positive patch-test reactions to two to seven allergens. However, because of the small number of patients with the crucial number of possible combinations, no cluster patterns were evident in the three- to seven-allergen combinations. Pairs of allergens most frequently observed were nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate (n = 23), formaldehyde and quaternium-15 (n = 18), and nickel sulfate and formaldehyde (n = 13). We found that nickel sulfate, once again the most frequent sensitizer, occurred in the majority of noncombined cases (MSI = -0.280).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Larger patch-test databases require evaluation to obtain further evidence of cluster patterns of multiple sensitivity and to validate the MSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2003.6166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: The variety of patterns of multiple sensitivity in patch-test data remains poorly defined. Studies addressing this topic have primarily concerned the occurrence of pairs of allergens, and some reports hypothesize a predisposing factor that influences the individual sensitivity of patients to multiple reactions.

Objective: The aim of this study was to address this topic by reanalyzing a matched data set from two patch-test units in Cleveland, OH, and one unit in Cologne, Germany, focusing on multiple reactions to identical allergens of the standard screening trays over the same 4-year period.

Methods: Based on the statistical FREQ procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), we propose a program for addressing the difficulties in computing and visualizing patterns of multiple sensitivity. Additionally, we propose the "multiple sensitivity index" (MSI) as an absolute measure for characterizing the occurrence of an allergen with others on a selected panel.

Results: For the seventeen allergens examined, 131072 possible combinations were evaluated in a total of 2881 patients. Of patients tested, 12.4% had multiple positive patch-test reactions to two to seven allergens. However, because of the small number of patients with the crucial number of possible combinations, no cluster patterns were evident in the three- to seven-allergen combinations. Pairs of allergens most frequently observed were nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate (n = 23), formaldehyde and quaternium-15 (n = 18), and nickel sulfate and formaldehyde (n = 13). We found that nickel sulfate, once again the most frequent sensitizer, occurred in the majority of noncombined cases (MSI = -0.280).

Conclusion: Larger patch-test databases require evaluation to obtain further evidence of cluster patterns of multiple sensitivity and to validate the MSI.

多个补丁测试反应:对在补丁测试数据库中可视化多个敏感性模式的组合方法的试点评估和一个多敏感性指数的建议。
背景:贴片测试数据中多重灵敏度模式的多样性仍然定义不清。针对这一主题的研究主要涉及对过敏原的发生,一些报告假设影响患者对多种反应的个体敏感性的易感因素。目的:本研究的目的是通过重新分析俄亥俄州克利夫兰的两个贴片测试单位和德国科隆的一个单位的匹配数据集来解决这一问题,重点关注在相同的4年期间对标准筛选托盘的相同过敏原的多重反应。方法:基于统计FREQ程序(SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC),我们提出了一个解决多灵敏度模式计算和可视化困难的程序。此外,我们提出了“多重敏感性指数”(MSI)作为一个绝对的措施,以表征一个过敏原的发生与其他选定的面板。结果:在共2881例患者中,对17种过敏原进行了131072种可能的组合评估。在接受测试的患者中,12.4%的人对2到7种过敏原有多次阳性的斑贴试验反应。然而,由于具有关键数量的可能组合的患者数量较少,因此在3至7种过敏原组合中没有明显的聚集模式。最常见的过敏原对是硫酸镍和重铬酸钾(n = 23)、甲醛和季铵盐-15 (n = 18)、硫酸镍和甲醛(n = 13)。我们发现硫酸镍是最常见的致敏剂,发生在大多数非联合病例中(MSI = -0.280)。结论:需要对更大的补丁测试数据库进行评估,以获得更多的多灵敏度聚类模式的证据,并验证MSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信