Integrated approach to off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

S Al-Ruzzeh, M Amrani, M Boscoe, J Farrimond, B Riedel, I Wright, S George
{"title":"Integrated approach to off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery","authors":"S Al-Ruzzeh,&nbsp;M Amrani,&nbsp;M Boscoe,&nbsp;J Farrimond,&nbsp;B Riedel,&nbsp;I Wright,&nbsp;S George","doi":"10.1016/S0967-2109(03)00028-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background:</em><span><span> The Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) technique is becoming more popular in many cardiac units throughout the world. This relatively new technique has prompted surgeons and anaesthetists to review and modify the routine approach to Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABG). In this study we reviewed and analysed the outcome of an integrated anaesthetic and surgical peri-operative approach that allowed routine use of OPCAB and avoided the use of </span>cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).</span></p><p><em>Methods:</em> We reviewed and analysed the data on the first consecutive 285 patients who were operated on using the OPCAB technique. These represent our initial experience with applying the OPCAB technique non-selectively for all patients over a period of 16 months.</p><p><em>Results:</em><span> All patients had at least 2-vessel disease. 807 grafts were performed (mean 2.8 per patient) of which 647 (80%) were arterial (mean 2.3 per patient). 179 (63%) patients underwent total arterial revascularization. Eight patients required cardiopulmonary bypass; all other operations were completed off-pump. Complications – mortality 3 (1%); renal failure 24 (8%); stroke 3 (1%) and atrial fibrillation 60 (21%).</span></p><p><em>Conclusion:</em> This retrospective analysis shows that provided a combined and integrated anaesthestic and surgical approach is used, beating heart technique for CABG can be safely offered to all patients with a good outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79324,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 299-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0967-2109(03)00028-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967210903000280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) technique is becoming more popular in many cardiac units throughout the world. This relatively new technique has prompted surgeons and anaesthetists to review and modify the routine approach to Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABG). In this study we reviewed and analysed the outcome of an integrated anaesthetic and surgical peri-operative approach that allowed routine use of OPCAB and avoided the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods: We reviewed and analysed the data on the first consecutive 285 patients who were operated on using the OPCAB technique. These represent our initial experience with applying the OPCAB technique non-selectively for all patients over a period of 16 months.

Results: All patients had at least 2-vessel disease. 807 grafts were performed (mean 2.8 per patient) of which 647 (80%) were arterial (mean 2.3 per patient). 179 (63%) patients underwent total arterial revascularization. Eight patients required cardiopulmonary bypass; all other operations were completed off-pump. Complications – mortality 3 (1%); renal failure 24 (8%); stroke 3 (1%) and atrial fibrillation 60 (21%).

Conclusion: This retrospective analysis shows that provided a combined and integrated anaesthestic and surgical approach is used, beating heart technique for CABG can be safely offered to all patients with a good outcome.

非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术的综合入路
背景:非体外循环冠状动脉旁路(OPCAB)技术在世界各地的许多心脏单位越来越流行。这项相对较新的技术促使外科医生和麻醉师重新审视和修改冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)的常规入路。在这项研究中,我们回顾并分析了一种综合麻醉和围手术期手术方法的结果,该方法允许常规使用OPCAB并避免使用体外循环(CPB)。方法:回顾分析首次连续行OPCAB术的285例患者的资料。这些是我们在16个月期间对所有患者非选择性应用OPCAB技术的初步经验。结果:所有患者均有至少2支血管病变。807例移植(平均2.8例/例),其中647例(80%)为动脉移植(平均2.3例/例)。179例(63%)患者接受了全动脉血运重建术。8例患者需要体外循环;所有其他操作均在无泵状态下完成。并发症——死亡率3 (1%);肾功能衰竭24例(8%);卒中3(1%)和房颤60(21%)。结论:本回顾性分析表明,如果采用麻醉和手术相结合的方法,心脏跳动技术可以安全地为所有CABG患者提供良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信