Randomized comparison of multiload standard and short devices.

Contraceptive delivery systems Pub Date : 1983-09-01
A Kivijarvi
{"title":"Randomized comparison of multiload standard and short devices.","authors":"A Kivijarvi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized study was conducted to compare the clinical performance of the ML Cu 25-standard and the ML Cu 250-short devices. 375 insertions were performed postmenstrually to mainly parous women 16-43 years of age. Over 90% of the women in both IUD groups had uterine sound lengths from 7-9 cm. The rates are based on the total of 4273 woman months of use. The lost-to-follow-up rates at 12 months were 6.7 and 4.6% for standard and short ML series, respectively. The ML Cu 250-standard had a lower pregnancy rate and a lower removal rate for bleeding and/or pain, but a higher expulsion rate that the short model. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The shortening of the vertical arm of the Multiload device has no remarkable effect on its clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":84493,"journal":{"name":"Contraceptive delivery systems","volume":"4 4","pages":"289-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraceptive delivery systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A randomized study was conducted to compare the clinical performance of the ML Cu 25-standard and the ML Cu 250-short devices. 375 insertions were performed postmenstrually to mainly parous women 16-43 years of age. Over 90% of the women in both IUD groups had uterine sound lengths from 7-9 cm. The rates are based on the total of 4273 woman months of use. The lost-to-follow-up rates at 12 months were 6.7 and 4.6% for standard and short ML series, respectively. The ML Cu 250-standard had a lower pregnancy rate and a lower removal rate for bleeding and/or pain, but a higher expulsion rate that the short model. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The shortening of the vertical arm of the Multiload device has no remarkable effect on its clinical performance.

多负荷标准装置与短负荷装置的随机比较。
我们进行了一项随机研究,比较ML - cu25标准装置和ML - cu250短装置的临床性能。经后插入375例,主要为16-43岁的产妇。两个宫内节育器组中超过90%的女性子宫音长在7-9厘米之间。费率是根据妇女总共使用4273个月计算的。12个月时,标准和短ML系列的失访率分别为6.7%和4.6%。ML - Cu - 250标准的妊娠率较低,出血和/或疼痛的拔除率较低,但排出率高于短型号。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义。Multiload器械垂直臂的缩短对其临床性能无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信