Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass grafts.

G Molinari, F Sardanelli, F Zandrino, M Balbi, M A Masperone
{"title":"Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass grafts.","authors":"G Molinari,&nbsp;F Sardanelli,&nbsp;F Zandrino,&nbsp;M Balbi,&nbsp;M A Masperone","doi":"10.1023/a:1006432027712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim of our work was to validate magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting occlusion/patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Twenty patients with previous history of bypass surgery and recurrent episodes of chest pain were enrolled. Two patients could not be studied (claustrophobia, erratic breathing). Thus, 18 patients with 51 bypasses were examined using a navigator echo sequence: 21 arterial grafts (six sequential) and 30 saphenous vein grafts (five sequential). All patients had undergone contrast conventional angiography 3-15 days before MRA. The magnetic resonance (MR) data set was analyzed by two independent readers blinded to the results of conventional angiography (occlusion of 12 of 51 grafts). At magnetic resonance, two bypasses of the posterior descending artery, patent at conventional angiography, could not be visualized because of imaging slab malpositioning. Interobserver concordance was 96% (47/49). Magnetic resonance and conventional angiography provided identical answers in 47 out of 49 (96%) of the examined grafts. Eleven out of 12 occluded grafts and 36 out of 37 patent grafts were correctly identified with MR. As far as occlusion is concerned, the sensitivity of MR was 91%, the specificity 97%. To summarize, a 30 min outpatient MR examination is highly reliable in determining occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential bypasses.</p>","PeriodicalId":77179,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiac imaging","volume":"16 3","pages":"149-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006432027712","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiac imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006432027712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Aim of our work was to validate magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting occlusion/patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Twenty patients with previous history of bypass surgery and recurrent episodes of chest pain were enrolled. Two patients could not be studied (claustrophobia, erratic breathing). Thus, 18 patients with 51 bypasses were examined using a navigator echo sequence: 21 arterial grafts (six sequential) and 30 saphenous vein grafts (five sequential). All patients had undergone contrast conventional angiography 3-15 days before MRA. The magnetic resonance (MR) data set was analyzed by two independent readers blinded to the results of conventional angiography (occlusion of 12 of 51 grafts). At magnetic resonance, two bypasses of the posterior descending artery, patent at conventional angiography, could not be visualized because of imaging slab malpositioning. Interobserver concordance was 96% (47/49). Magnetic resonance and conventional angiography provided identical answers in 47 out of 49 (96%) of the examined grafts. Eleven out of 12 occluded grafts and 36 out of 37 patent grafts were correctly identified with MR. As far as occlusion is concerned, the sensitivity of MR was 91%, the specificity 97%. To summarize, a 30 min outpatient MR examination is highly reliable in determining occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential bypasses.

导航仪回声磁共振血管造影在检测动脉、静脉闭塞/通畅、单次和顺序冠状动脉旁路移植术中的价值。
我们的工作目的是验证磁共振血管成像(MRA)在检测冠状动脉搭桥术闭塞/通畅中的应用。20例既往有搭桥手术史且胸痛反复发作的患者入选。2例患者无法进行研究(幽闭恐惧症,呼吸不稳定)。因此,采用导航回声序列对18例51次旁路手术患者进行了检查:21例动脉移植(6例连续)和30例隐静脉移植(5例连续)。所有患者均于MRA前3-15天行常规血管造影。磁共振(MR)数据集由两名独立的阅读者进行分析,阅读者对传统血管造影结果不知情(51例移植物中有12例闭塞)。磁共振显示两条后降支旁路,常规血管造影未通畅,由于成像板错位而无法显示。观察者间一致性为96%(47/49)。磁共振和常规血管造影在49例(96%)移植物检查中提供了相同的答案。12个闭塞移植物中11个和37个通畅移植物中36个被MR正确识别。就闭塞而言,MR的敏感性为91%,特异性为97%。总而言之,30分钟门诊MR检查在确定动脉和静脉、单次和连续旁路闭塞/通畅方面是高度可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信