An investigation of secondary exposure misclassification effects of lifelong occupational history in exposure estimation.

N A Esmen, T A Hall, R A Stone, G M Marsh, M J Gula, C K Gause
{"title":"An investigation of secondary exposure misclassification effects of lifelong occupational history in exposure estimation.","authors":"N A Esmen,&nbsp;T A Hall,&nbsp;R A Stone,&nbsp;G M Marsh,&nbsp;M J Gula,&nbsp;C K Gause","doi":"10.1080/00028899908984432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of exposure misclassification on the interpretation of results of occupational epidemiological studies has been widely investigated and reported. Usually, only the direct effects of misclassification have been considered or simple estimates of misclassification rates have been assigned to various types of exposure estimation processes. Lifelong job profile data obtained from a previously published case-control study provided complete or nearly complete job histories of 511 decedents. An analysis of these work histories and the comparison of exposures related to longest-held job to estimated total lifetime exposures suggest that single job-based exposure estimates may lead to significant exposure misclassification rates. In addition, the appearance of shorter duration jobs in a study population occurring predominantly early in the work history may exacerbate problems associated with exposure misclassification. While few specific suggestions emerge from this analysis, the inclusion of extensive recording of the work history of study subjects emerges as a reasonable basis for the investigation and potential reduction of secondary misclassification of exposures in occupational epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7930,"journal":{"name":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","volume":"60 2","pages":"175-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984432","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The effects of exposure misclassification on the interpretation of results of occupational epidemiological studies has been widely investigated and reported. Usually, only the direct effects of misclassification have been considered or simple estimates of misclassification rates have been assigned to various types of exposure estimation processes. Lifelong job profile data obtained from a previously published case-control study provided complete or nearly complete job histories of 511 decedents. An analysis of these work histories and the comparison of exposures related to longest-held job to estimated total lifetime exposures suggest that single job-based exposure estimates may lead to significant exposure misclassification rates. In addition, the appearance of shorter duration jobs in a study population occurring predominantly early in the work history may exacerbate problems associated with exposure misclassification. While few specific suggestions emerge from this analysis, the inclusion of extensive recording of the work history of study subjects emerges as a reasonable basis for the investigation and potential reduction of secondary misclassification of exposures in occupational epidemiological studies.

终身职业史对暴露评估中二次暴露误分类影响的调查。
暴露误分类对职业流行病学研究结果解释的影响已被广泛调查和报道。通常,只考虑误分类的直接影响,或者对各种类型的暴露估计过程分配简单的误分类率估计。从先前发表的病例对照研究中获得的终身工作概况数据提供了511名死者的完整或近乎完整的工作历史。对这些工作经历的分析以及与长期工作相关的暴露与估计的总寿命暴露的比较表明,基于单一工作的暴露估计可能导致显著的暴露错误分类率。此外,在研究人群中出现的短期工作主要出现在工作历史的早期,可能会加剧与暴露错误分类相关的问题。虽然这一分析没有提出什么具体建议,但纳入研究对象的广泛工作史记录是调查的合理基础,并有可能减少职业流行病学研究中暴露的二次错误分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信