Special report on health care delivery systems. Trends in the integrated delivery of health care and the corporate practice of medicine.

Health care law newsletter Pub Date : 1994-10-01
R Sevell, T L Wagner, J Douglas
{"title":"Special report on health care delivery systems. Trends in the integrated delivery of health care and the corporate practice of medicine.","authors":"R Sevell,&nbsp;T L Wagner,&nbsp;J Douglas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prospects for federal legislation preempting state corporate practice restrictions are unclear. The health care reform bill originally introduced by President Clinton contained a provision that would have preempted \"any state law related to the corporate practice of medicine\" insofar as it applied to the arrangements between non-fee-for-service health plans and their participating providers. H.R. 3600/S. 1757, 103d Cong., 1st Sess. 1407(b) (1993). Whether and in what form a preemption provision may survive the legislative process and see a Presidential signature remains to be seen. The particular fate of the federal legislation notwithstanding, however, health care executives can nevertheless remain confident that the legal treatment of the \"corporate practice\" of medicine will continue to be of vital concern as the various forms of health care organizations evolve in the ongoing struggle to deliver quality medicine at affordable prices.</p>","PeriodicalId":79604,"journal":{"name":"Health care law newsletter","volume":"9 10","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health care law newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prospects for federal legislation preempting state corporate practice restrictions are unclear. The health care reform bill originally introduced by President Clinton contained a provision that would have preempted "any state law related to the corporate practice of medicine" insofar as it applied to the arrangements between non-fee-for-service health plans and their participating providers. H.R. 3600/S. 1757, 103d Cong., 1st Sess. 1407(b) (1993). Whether and in what form a preemption provision may survive the legislative process and see a Presidential signature remains to be seen. The particular fate of the federal legislation notwithstanding, however, health care executives can nevertheless remain confident that the legal treatment of the "corporate practice" of medicine will continue to be of vital concern as the various forms of health care organizations evolve in the ongoing struggle to deliver quality medicine at affordable prices.

关于卫生保健提供系统的特别报告。综合提供医疗保健和集体行医的趋势。
联邦立法取代州公司实践限制的前景尚不明朗。最初由克林顿总统提出的医疗改革法案包含一项条款,该条款将优先于“任何与企业医疗实践有关的州法律”,因为它适用于非付费服务医疗计划与其参与提供者之间的安排。3600号决议/ S。1757年,第103届,第1407(b)届(1993)。是否以及以何种形式的优先条款可以通过立法程序并看到总统的签名还有待观察。然而,尽管联邦立法的特殊命运,卫生保健行政人员仍然可以相信,随着各种形式的卫生保健组织在不断努力以可承受的价格提供高质量药品的过程中不断发展,对医疗"企业实践"的法律处理将继续是一个至关重要的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信