Surfactant replacement therapy: a multicentric trial comparing two dosage approaches.

R M Fiori, E M Diniz, J M Lopes, A L Gonçalves, M T da Costa, W T Marino, V O Abdallah, C A Segre, M de Carvalho, W M Guimarães, P R Margotto, G Bevilacqua
{"title":"Surfactant replacement therapy: a multicentric trial comparing two dosage approaches.","authors":"R M Fiori,&nbsp;E M Diniz,&nbsp;J M Lopes,&nbsp;A L Gonçalves,&nbsp;M T da Costa,&nbsp;W T Marino,&nbsp;V O Abdallah,&nbsp;C A Segre,&nbsp;M de Carvalho,&nbsp;W M Guimarães,&nbsp;P R Margotto,&nbsp;G Bevilacqua","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study the results of two different initial doses (Group A: 200 mg/kg--82 patients; Group B: 100 mg/kg--83 patients) of a porcine surfactant were compared in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Main entry criteria were: birth weight between 700 and 2,000 grams, need of mechanical ventilation, FiO2 > or = 0.60 to obtain a PaO2 between 50 and 80 mmHg (PaO2/FiO2 < or = 133.3 mmHg) and less than 15 hours of postnatal age. Two further 100 mg/kg doses could be given in both groups at 12 hours interval if FiO2 was > 0.40. Birth weight (Group A: 1,231 +/- 281 g. and Group B: 1,324 +/- 355 g.), gestational age (Group A: 29.9 +/- 2.7 wk. and Group B: 30.6 +/- 2.6 wk.) and Apgar scores were similar in the two groups. Group A had a significantly higher mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.05) after 12 hours--178 (40-506) vs 133 (17-243) mmHg, before receiving a 2nd dose, after 24 hours--180 (17-431) vs 152 (39-360), and in the 3rd day--177 (40-333) vs 124 (24-249) and needed a lower FiO2 (p < 0.05) after 36 hours (0.47 +/- 0.20 vs 0.53 +/- 0.23) and on the 3rd day (0.51 +/- 0.23 vs 0.61 +/- 0.24). The mean peak inspiratory pressure was lower in Group A at 36 hours (17.5 +/- 4.5 vs 20.6 +/- 6.8) after the initial dose (p < 0.05). The time of exposure to high oxygen concentrations (FiO2 > or = 0.40) was lower in Group A--85 (3-643) vs 131 (3-672) hours; p < 0.05). Total amount of phospholipids given per patient was meanly 224 mg in Group A and 144 mg in Group B. Mortality was lower in group A but without significant difference (Group A: 17/82; Group B: 26/83). The analysis of the subgroup of babies with less than 1,500 gr. at birth showed a statistically significant difference in mortality (Group A: 15/70; Group B: 24/56; p < 0.02).</p>","PeriodicalId":6943,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma","volume":"68 Suppl 1 ","pages":"55-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study the results of two different initial doses (Group A: 200 mg/kg--82 patients; Group B: 100 mg/kg--83 patients) of a porcine surfactant were compared in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Main entry criteria were: birth weight between 700 and 2,000 grams, need of mechanical ventilation, FiO2 > or = 0.60 to obtain a PaO2 between 50 and 80 mmHg (PaO2/FiO2 < or = 133.3 mmHg) and less than 15 hours of postnatal age. Two further 100 mg/kg doses could be given in both groups at 12 hours interval if FiO2 was > 0.40. Birth weight (Group A: 1,231 +/- 281 g. and Group B: 1,324 +/- 355 g.), gestational age (Group A: 29.9 +/- 2.7 wk. and Group B: 30.6 +/- 2.6 wk.) and Apgar scores were similar in the two groups. Group A had a significantly higher mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.05) after 12 hours--178 (40-506) vs 133 (17-243) mmHg, before receiving a 2nd dose, after 24 hours--180 (17-431) vs 152 (39-360), and in the 3rd day--177 (40-333) vs 124 (24-249) and needed a lower FiO2 (p < 0.05) after 36 hours (0.47 +/- 0.20 vs 0.53 +/- 0.23) and on the 3rd day (0.51 +/- 0.23 vs 0.61 +/- 0.24). The mean peak inspiratory pressure was lower in Group A at 36 hours (17.5 +/- 4.5 vs 20.6 +/- 6.8) after the initial dose (p < 0.05). The time of exposure to high oxygen concentrations (FiO2 > or = 0.40) was lower in Group A--85 (3-643) vs 131 (3-672) hours; p < 0.05). Total amount of phospholipids given per patient was meanly 224 mg in Group A and 144 mg in Group B. Mortality was lower in group A but without significant difference (Group A: 17/82; Group B: 26/83). The analysis of the subgroup of babies with less than 1,500 gr. at birth showed a statistically significant difference in mortality (Group A: 15/70; Group B: 24/56; p < 0.02).

表面活性剂替代疗法:一项比较两种剂量方法的多中心试验。
在本研究中,两种不同初始剂量的结果(A组:200 mg/kg—82例;B组:100 mg/kg(83例)猪表面活性剂治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征。主要入组标准为:出生体重在700 ~ 2000克之间,需要机械通气,FiO2 >或= 0.60以获得PaO2在50 ~ 80 mmHg之间(PaO2/FiO2 <或= 133.3 mmHg),出生后小于15小时。如果FiO2 > 0.40,两组可间隔12 h再给药2次100 mg/kg。出生体重(A组:1231 +/- 281 g, B组:1324 +/- 355 g),胎龄(A组:29.9 +/- 2.7周)。B组:30.6±2.6周),两组Apgar评分相近。A组在接受第二次剂量前,12小时-178 (40-506)vs 133 (17-243) mmHg后,24小时-180 (17-431)vs 152(39-360),第3天-177 (40-333)vs 124(24-249)后,平均PaO2/FiO2比值显著升高(p < 0.05), 36小时(0.47 +/- 0.20 vs 0.53 +/- 0.23)和第3天(0.51 +/- 0.23 vs 0.61 +/- 0.24)后需要较低的FiO2 (p < 0.05)。初始给药后36 h, A组平均峰值吸气压较低(17.5 +/- 4.5 vs 20.6 +/- 6.8) (p < 0.05)。A组暴露于高氧浓度(FiO2 > or = 0.40)的时间-85(3-643)比131(3-672)小时更短;P < 0.05)。A组和b组患者平均每人给予的磷脂总量分别为224 mg和144 mg, A组死亡率较低,但无显著差异(A组:17/82;B组:26/83)。对出生时体重小于1500克的婴儿亚组的分析显示,死亡率有统计学上的显著差异(a组:15/70;B组:24/56;P < 0.02)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信